Esophageal Foreign Body Imaging 

No Results

No Results

processing….

Prompt treatment of an infant or child with a suspected esophageal foreign body is crucial because of the potential for severe complications. Radiographic evaluation of the esophageal foreign body is warranted in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Ingestions that are witnessed are generally managed without problems. Conversely, diagnosis of nonwitnessed ingestions can often be difficult and delayed. This delay in diagnosis can result in severe morbidity and mortality. ^{[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]}

(See the images below.)

See Foreign Bodies: Curious Findings, a Critical Images slideshow, to help identify various foreign objects and determine appropriate interventions and treatment options.

The radiographic evaluation begins with the acquisition of anteroposterior and lateral chest, lateral neck, and supine abdominal radiographs to complete the examination from the nasopharynx to the rectum. ^{[6, 12, 13, 14]}

If a child is referred from an outside institution, a repeat chest radiograph can be obtained to reconfirm the presence of the foreign body in the esophagus or confirm its passage beyond the esophagus, obviating a retrieval procedure. ^[15]

If the presence of a nonradiopaque object is suspected after the initial series of radiographs is obtained, contrast-enhanced esophagography is indicated to rule out a radiolucent foreign body. Further evaluation with cross-sectional imaging may be required to determine the presence and extent of mediastinitis versus mediastinal abscess formation. ^{[16, 17]}

The major limitation of the initial plain radiographic evaluation is the potential failure to visualize the nonradiopaque foreign body. Small esophageal foreign bodies, such as button batteries, may also be difficult to visualize on plain radiographs alone. ^[5] Additional evaluation is required when the suspected foreign body is not radiopaque or when the presence of a retained object is highly suspected. The initial radiographic evaluation also can cause underestimation of the extent or degree of involvement, such as the amount of edema with foreign bodies that are retained for long periods.

For patient education resources, see the Digestive Disorders Center as well as Battery Ingestion.

The initial plain radiographic series is crucial in the diagnosis of an esophageal foreign body, because the location and characteristics of the esophageal foreign body direct treatment. The most common site of foreign body lodgment is the upper esophagus at the level of the thoracic inlet. ^[6]

On the frontal chest radiograph, an opaque foreign body is depicted at the midclavicular level. A coin in the esophagus is depicted in the coronal plane of a frontal image because of the inherent configuration of the esophagus. If the coin is in the sagittal plane of the frontal image, the foreign body most likely is in the trachea. The orientation is generally caused by the incomplete circumferential cartilaginous rings along the posterior aspect of the trachea that allow the coin to protrude posteriorly. ^{[12, 13]} (See the images below.)

The second most common site for esophageal foreign body retention is the level of the carina and aortic arch because of normal physiologic narrowing in the mid esophagus at this level. The third location is the distal esophagus slightly above the gastroesophageal junction. On the frontal chest radiograph, this location is approximately 3 vertebral body levels above the gastric air bubble. If a radiopaque foreign body is seen at another level, an underlying stricture should be suspected, and further investigation with contrast-enhanced esophagography is indicated.

The characteristics of the object (eg, radiopaque or radiolucent and sharp or blunt) and the number of retained items affect the choice of retrieval method. ^[18] Additional plain radiographic findings may include soft-tissue masses; these may represent inflammatory changes and possibly indicate a more chronic process.

Tracheal displacement or compression suggests mediastinal inflammation and airway compromise (see the images below). An air-fluid level suggests mediastinal abscess formation, whereas a pneumomediastinum may indicate an esophageal perforation.

If the presence of a nonradiopaque foreign body is suspected, contrast-enhanced esophagography is indicated. Positive findings on the esophagram include irregularity of the contrast medium column or esophageal mucosa, as well as deviation in the expected course of the esophagus. Underlying stricture formation, with or without proximal esophageal dilatation or diverticula formation caused by chronic esophageal perforation, also may be present.

Foreign bodies that migrate outside the esophagus into the mediastinum or soft tissues usually cause respiratory symptoms. Complete foreign body migration outside the esophagus is occult on esophagoscopic images, but it may be depicted on chest radiographs.

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scanning is indicated for the assessment of a suspected esophageal foreign body when the plain radiographic findings are negative, the contrast-enhanced esophagographic findings are positive, or the presence of an esophageal foreign body is highly suspected.

CT can aid in characterizing the nature of the foreign body, as well as the presence and extent of surrounding disease such as mediastinitis or abscess formation. Also, small foreign bodies that cannot be visualized with a standard radiologic examination can be evaluated with CT. Chicken and fish bones lodged in the hypopharynx and cervical esophagus are difficult to evaluate on plain radiographs. ^{[19, 20, 21]} CT is also valuable in the assessment of complications of foreign body removal. ^{[7, 22, 8, 14]}  (See the image below.)

CT was found to be a useful method for identification of esophageal fish bone foreign bodies, and the authors of the study suggested that CT be considered a first-choice technique for the diagnosis of esophageal fish bone foreign body. In 88 patients studied with a history of fish bone impaction, 66 patients were discovered to have a fish bone foreign body in the esophagus by CT, as compared to 30 patients by plain radiography. ^[19]

Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) has been found to be useful for the evaluation of pharyngeal and upper esophageal foreign bodies. In one study, the sensitivity of MDCT for the detection of foreign bodies was 100%, which was superior to that of plain radiography (51.7%). ^[20]

Multslice spiral CT (MSCT) has been found to accurately locate most foreign bodies, but dual-source CT (DSCT) uses a lower dose of radiation and and has higher resolution. ^[23]

Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the preferred cross-sectional imaging tool for evaluating the full extent of cervicothoracic masses and the relationships between neurovascular structures, it is not the initial imaging method of choice for the workup for a retained foreign body or traumatic lesion. However, MRIs can readily demonstrate the extent of a mediastinal inflammatory abscess or granuloma formation.

Arms JL, Mackenberg-Mohn MD, Bowen MV, Chamberlain MC, Skrypek TM, Madhok M. Safety and Efficacy of a Protocol Using Bougienage or Endoscopy for the Management of Coins Acutely Lodged in the Esophagus: A Large Case Series. Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Oct 13. [Medline].

Lin HH, Lee SC, Chu HC, Chang WK, Chao YC, Hsieh TY. Emergency endoscopic management of dietary foreign bodies in the esophagus. Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Jul. 25(6):662-5. [Medline].

Smith MT, Wong RK. Esophageal foreign bodies: types and techniques for removal. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb. 9(1):75-84. [Medline].

Waltzman ML. Management of esophageal coins. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2006 Oct. 18(5):571-4. [Medline].

Pugmire BS, Lin TK, Pentiuk S, de Alarcon A, Hart CK, Trout AT. Imaging button battery ingestions and insertions in children: a 15-year single-center review. Pediatr Radiol. 2017 Feb. 47 (2):178-185. [Medline].

Pinto A, Lanza C, Pinto F, Grassi R, Romano L, Brunese L, et al. Role of plain radiography in the assessment of ingested foreign bodies in the pediatric patients. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2015 Feb. 36 (1):21-7. [Medline].

Young CA, Menias CO, Bhalla S, Prasad SR. CT features of esophageal emergencies. Radiographics. 2008 Oct. 28(6):1541-53. [Medline].

Ma J, Kang DK, Bae JI, Park KJ, Sun JS. Value of MDCT in Diagnosis and Management of Esophageal Sharp or Pointed Foreign Bodies According to Level of Esophagus. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Nov. 201(5):W707-11. [Medline].

Geraci G, Sciume’ C, Di Carlo G, Picciurro A, Modica G. Retrospective analysis of management of ingested foreign bodies and food impactions in emergency endoscopic setting in adults. BMC Emerg Med. 2016 Nov 4. 16 (1):42. [Medline].

Leinwand K, Brumbaugh DE, Kramer RE. Button Battery Ingestion in Children: A Paradigm for Management of Severe Pediatric Foreign Body Ingestions. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2016 Jan. 26 (1):99-118. [Medline].

Birk M, Bauerfeind P, Deprez PH, Häfner M, Hartmann D, Hassan C, et al. Removal of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract in adults: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2016 May. 48 (5):489-96. [Medline].

Wu IS, Ho TL, Chang CC, Lee HS, Chen MK. Value of lateral neck radiography for ingested foreign bodies using the likelihood ratio. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Apr. 37(2):292-6. [Medline].

Dalgorf D, Trimble K, Papsin B, Forte V. Radiological features of ingested metallic mesh earphone pieces. Pediatr Radiol. 2008 Dec. 38(12):1342-4. [Medline].

Pinto A, Muzj C, Gagliardi N, Pinto F, Setola FR, Scaglione M, et al. Role of imaging in the assessment of impacted foreign bodies in the hypopharynx and cervical esophagus. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2012 Oct. 33(5):463-70. [Medline].

Dedhia K, Chang YF, Leonardis R, Chi DH. Is There a Need for Repeat Radiologic Examination of Children with Esophageal Coin Foreign Body?. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jan. 156 (1):173-179. [Medline].

Jaramillo D, Cleveland RN, Blickman JG. Radiologic management of esophageal foreign bodies. Semin Intervent Radiol. 8:198-203.

Castellote A, Vazquez E, Vera J. Cervicothoracic lesions in infants and children. Radiographics. 1999 May-Jun. 19(3):583-600. [Medline].

Zamary KR, Davis JW, Ament EE, Dirks RC, Garry JE. This too shall pass: A study of ingested sharp foreign bodies. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jan. 82 (1):150-155. [Medline].

Woo SH, Kim KH. Proposal for methods of diagnosis of fish bone foreign body in the Esophagus. Laryngoscope. 2015 May 11. [Medline].

Fish bone foreign bodies in the pharynx and upper esophagus: evaluation with 64-slice MDCT. Acta Radiol. 2014 Feb. 55 (1):8-13. [Medline].

Kim HU. Oroesophageal Fish Bone Foreign Body. Clin Endosc. 2016 Jul. 49 (4):318-26. [Medline].

Brenner MJ, Floyd L, Collins SL. Role of computed tomography and bronchoscopy in speech prosthesis aspiration. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2007 Dec. 116(12):882-6. [Medline].

Zhu Z, Li W, Zhang L, Hu J, Wang W, Ma Z. The predictive role of dual source CT for esophageal foreign bodies. Am J Otolaryngol. 2014 Mar-Apr. 35 (2):215-8. [Medline].

Dokler ML, Bradshaw J, Mollitt DL. Selective management of pediatric esophageal foreign bodies. Am Surg. 1995 Feb. 61(2):132-4. [Medline].

Emslander HC, Bonadio W, Klatzo M. Efficacy of esophageal bougienage by emergency physicians in pediatric coin ingestion. Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Jun. 27(6):726-9. [Medline].

Gilchrist BF, Valerie EP, Nguyen M. Pearls and perils in the management of prolonged, peculiar, penetrating esophageal foreign bodies in children. J Pediatr Surg. 1997 Oct. 32(10):1429-31. [Medline].

Soprano JV, Mandl KD. Four strategies for the management of esophageal coins in children. Pediatrics. 2000 Jan. 105(1):e5. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Simone LA, Orsborn J, Berant R, Tessaro MO. Point-of-care ultrasonography in the detection of pediatric esophageal food impaction. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Apr. 34 (4):763.e1-3. [Medline].

Veronica Rooks, MD Military Chief of Pediatric Radiology, Pediatric Radiologist, Tripler Army Medical Center; Assistant Professor of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences

Veronica Rooks, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, Radiological Society of North America, Society for Pediatric Radiology, Association of Program Directors in Radiology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Ellen M Chung, MD Chief, Pediatric Radiology Section, American Institute for Radiologic Pathology

Ellen M Chung, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Women Radiologists, American College of Radiology, American Medical Association, American Roentgen Ray Society, Radiological Society of North America, Society for Pediatric Radiology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

David A Stringer, MBBS, FRCR, FRCPC Professor, National University of Singapore; Head, Diagnostic Imaging, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore

David A Stringer, MBBS, FRCR, FRCPC is a member of the following medical societies: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Royal College of Radiologists, Society for Pediatric Radiology, British Columbia Medical Association, European Society of Paediatric Radiology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

John Karani, MBBS, FRCR Clinical Director of Radiology and Consultant Radiologist, Department of Radiology, King’s College Hospital, UK

John Karani, MBBS, FRCR is a member of the following medical societies: British Institute of Radiology, Radiological Society of North America, Royal College of Radiologists, Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, European Society of Radiology, European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology, British Society of Interventional Radiology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Fredric A Hoffer, MD, FSIR Affiliate Professor of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine; Member, Quality Assurance Review Center

Fredric A Hoffer, MD, FSIR is a member of the following medical societies: Children’s Oncology Group, Radiological Society of North America, Society for Pediatric Radiology, Society of Interventional Radiology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Esophageal Foreign Body Imaging 

Research & References of Esophageal Foreign Body Imaging |A&C Accounting And Tax Services
Source

Share on Facebook

Tweet

Follow us