Appendicitis Imaging
No Results
No Results
processing….
The appendix is a blind-ending tubular structure arising from the cecum. Appendicitis results from an acute inflammation of the appendix and creates the most common abdominal surgical emergency. Acute appendicitis is a common gastrointestinal disease affecting 5.7–57/per 100.000 individuals each year, with the highest incidence in children and adolescents. Imaging studies in patients with a clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis can reduce the negative appendectomy rate, which has been reported to be as high as 15%. [1]
A color Doppler ultrasonogram of appendicitis is shown below.
A diagnosis of acute appendicitis is usually made on the basis of a patient’s clinical history in conjunction with physical examination and laboratory studies. Because the surgical aim is to operate early—before appendiceal rupture and peritonitis develop—patients who present with typical findings undergo immediate surgery without radiologic evaluation. However, such imaging is advisable in patients with atypical symptoms, which can occur in infants and small children, the elderly, and young women (see the image below).
See Appendicitis: Avoiding Pitfalls in Diagnosis, a Critical Images slideshow, to help make an accurate diagnosis.
Controversy exists as to whether imaging is required in patients with the classic history and physical findings of acute appendicitis. Opinion varies as to whether these modalities should be performed in all patients with suggested appendicitis or if radiology should be reserved for select patients with atypical or confusing clinical presentations.
Appropriateness criteria have been published by the American College of Radiology (ACR) for right lower quadrant pain suggestive of appendicitis. In the appropriateness criteria, ratings of 7 to 9 are considered “usually appropriate.” Computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis with intravenous contrast is rated 8, and CT of the abdomen and pelvis without contrast is rated 7. [2] .
Ratings of 4 to 6 indicate that studies “may be appropriate.” Right lower quadrant ultrasound with graded compression is rated 6, and abdominal radiographs (for excluding free air or obstruction) are rated 5. Magnetic resonance imaging is rated 4. Ratings of 1 to 3 indicate that studies “are usually not appropriate.” Barium enema and technetium-99m white cell scanning are rated 3. [2]
According to the ACR, computed tomography is the most accurate imaging study for evaluating suspected acute appendicitis and alternative etiologies of right lower quadrant pain. In children, ultrasound is the preferred initial examination, because it is nearly as accurate as CT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in this population without use of ionizing radiation. In pregnant women, ultrasound is preferred initially, with MRI as a second imaging examination in inconclusive cases. [3] In a retrospective review of MRI in 42 pregnant patients for detection of acute appendicitis, accuracy was 88.1%, sensitivity 60%, specificity 91.9%, positive predictive value 50%, and negative predictive value 94.4%. [4]
Multidetector computed tomography scanning and graded-compression Doppler ultrasonography are powerful imaging methods that substantially improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with clinically equivocal appendicitis. [5] Continuous improvements in imaging technology, technique, and interpretation that have been achieved over the past 15 years have substantially increased the accuracy of imaging methods. US and CT scanning have gained acceptance as the primary imaging techniques for acute appendicitis by virtue of their ability to directly image the appendix, adjacent fat, and gut. [6]
Graded-compression US of the right lower quadrant (RLQ) has been shown to be a useful examination because of this technique’s safety and high accuracy (approximately 90%) in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Advantages of US include lack of radiation exposure, noninvasiveness, short acquisition time, and the potential for diagnosis of other causes of abdominal pain, particularly in the subset of patients who are women of childbearing age. Several authors suggest that US should be the first imaging method used in pregnant women and pediatric patients because x-ray exposure is especially undesirable in these groups.
Contrast-enhanced, thin-section (0.5 mm) CT scanning has become the preferred imaging technique in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and its complications, with a high diagnostic accuracy of 95-98%. The literature suggests that limited helical CT scanning with rectal contrast is a highly accurate, time-efficient, cost-effective way to evaluate adult patients with equivocal presentations for appendicitis. CT scanning is particularly preferred in patients in whom appendiceal perforation is suspected, because the diagnostic accuracy remains high and because CT scanning is useful for characterizing periappendiceal inflammatory masses. Ultrasonography has been found to be highly specific but nonsensitive for perforated appendicitis. [7]
Other advanced radiologic examinations, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), scintigraphy, and color Doppler US, have been used in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, with a diagnostic accuracy of approximately 91-95%. [8, 9, 10, 11]
Advantages of MRI include better visualization of abnormal appendices and adjacent inflammatory processes, visualization of the appendix in an atypical location, delineation of pathology, operator independence, and ease of examination of patients who are obese. MRI, similarly to enhanced CT scanning, can demonstrate the extent of inflammatory infiltration. [12, 10, 4, 11]
The decision to obtain US or CT scan studies depends on institutional preference and the available user expertise, although patient age, sex, and body habitus are important influencing factors. US and CT scanning have similar diagnostic value for detecting an alternative diagnosis in a patient in whom acute appendicitis is suspected. [13, 5, 14, 15, 6, 7]
In a meta-analysis of 6 prospective studies, CT demonstrated superior sensitivity (91%) and specificity (90%) over ultrasonography (sensitivity 78%; specificity, 83%). [16]
Delaying surgery to complete a radiologic investigation for appendicitis was found not to increase the rate of perforation or complications but did decrease the rate of negative appendectomies. The rate of negative appendectomy decreased significantly with CT compared to clinical evaluation only (9.3% vs 5%). Ultrasonography alone, however, did not result in a rate decrease. [17]
Abdominal radiographs are normal in many patients with acute appendicitis and should not be obtained routinely. An appendicolith is the most specific sign on plain radiographic films, but it is observed in only 10% of patients with appendicitis. Disadvantages of barium enema include a high incidence of nondiagnostic examinations, radiation exposure, insufficient sensitivity, and invasiveness.
A significant disadvantage of US is that it is operator dependent. Intestinal peristalsis, pulsations of the iliac artery (when it is close to the appendix), deep respiration in noncooperative patients, and difficulty maintaining the probe at the same location for a long time are disadvantages of color Doppler US in detecting increased vascularity of the appendix.
Disadvantages of CT scanning include radiation exposure, the potential for anaphylactoid reaction if intravenous (IV) contrast is used, lengthy preparation time if oral contrast is used, and patient discomfort if rectal contrast is used.
Disadvantages of MRI include high cost, use of IV contrast, the requirement that patients fully cooperate, difficulty with patients who are claustrophobic, the inability to observe an appendicolith in the lumen (an important finding in acute appendicitis), and the inability to differentiate between gas and an appendicolith in the perforation site.
Disadvantages of radionuclide scanning include long acquisition times (approximately 5 h) and the lack of availability of this modality.
For patient education information, see eMedicineHealth’s Digestive Disorders Center, as well as Appendicitis, Abdominal Pain in Adults, and Abdominal Pain in Children.
[Guideline] Gorter RR, Eker HH, Gorter-Stam MA, et al. Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015. Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov. 30 (11):4668-4690. [Medline].
[Guideline] Rosen MP, Ding A, Blake MA, Baker ME, Cash BD, Fidler JL, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® right lower quadrant pain–suspected appendicitis. J Am Coll Radiol. 2011 Nov. 8(11):749-55. [Medline].
[Guideline] Smith MP, Katz DS, Lalani T, Carucci LR, Cash BD, Kim DH, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Right Lower Quadrant Pain–Suspected Appendicitis. Ultrasound Q. 2015 Jun. 31 (2):85-91. [Medline].
Patel D, Fingard J, Winters S, Low G. Clinical use of MRI for the evaluation of acute appendicitis during pregnancy. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Jul. 42 (7):1857-1863. [Medline].
Shin LK, Jeffrey RB, Berry GJ, Olcott EW. Spectral Doppler Waveforms for Diagnosis of Appendicitis: Potential Utility of Point Peak Systolic Velocity and Resistive Index Values. Radiology. 2017 Jun 5. 162251. [Medline].
Imler D, Keller C, Sivasankar S, Wang NE, Vasanawala S, Bruzoni M, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Ultrasound as the Initial Imaging Modality for Pediatric and Young Adult Patients With Suspected Appendicitis. Acad Emerg Med. 2017 May. 24 (5):569-577. [Medline].
Carpenter JL, Orth RC, Zhang W, Lopez ME, Mangona KL, Guillerman RP. Diagnostic Performance of US for Differentiating Perforated from Nonperforated Pediatric Appendicitis: A Prospective Cohort Study. Radiology. 2017 Mar. 282 (3):835-841. [Medline].
Herliczek TW, Swenson DW, Mayo-Smith WW. Utility of MRI after inconclusive ultrasound in pediatric patients with suspected appendicitis: retrospective review of 60 consecutive patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 May. 200(5):969-73. [Medline].
Aydin F, Kin Cengiz A, Güngör F. Tc-99m Labeled HMPAO white Blood Cell Scintigraphy in Pediatric Patients. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2012 Apr. 21(1):13-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Rosenbaum DG, Askin G, Beneck DM, Kovanlikaya A. Differentiating perforated from non-perforated appendicitis on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Radiol. 2017 Jun 3. [Medline].
Lyons GR, Renjen P, Askin G, Giambrone AE, Beneck D, Kovanlikaya A. Diagnostic utility of intravenous contrast for MR imaging in pediatric appendicitis. Pediatr Radiol. 2017 Apr. 47 (4):398-403. [Medline].
Didier RA, Hopkins KL, Coakley FV, Krishnaswami S, Spiro DM, Foster BR. Performance characteristics of magnetic resonance imaging without contrast agents or sedation in pediatric appendicitis. Pediatr Radiol. 2017 Jun 19. [Medline].
Jin M, Sanchez TR, Lamba R, Fananapazir G, Corwin MT. Accuracy and Radiation Dose Reduction of Limited-Range CT in the Evaluation of Acute Appendicitis in Pediatric Patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jun 13. 1-5. [Medline].
Fields MJ, Davis J, Alsup C, Bates A, Au A, Adhikari S, et al. Accuracy of Point of Care Ultrasonography for Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2017 May 2. [Medline].
Yun SJ, Ryu CW, Choi NY, Kim HC, Oh JY, Yang DM. Comparison of Low- and Standard-Dose CT for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: A Meta-Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Mar 16. W1-W10. [Medline].
van Randen A, Bipat S, Zwinderman AH, Ubbink DT, Stoker J, Boermeester MA. Acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of CT and graded compression US related to prevalence of disease. Radiology. 2008 Oct. 249(1):97-106. [Medline].
Sauvain MO, Slankamenac K, Muller MK, Wildi S, Metzger U, Schmid W, et al. Delaying surgery to perform CT scans for suspected appendicitis decreases the rate of negative appendectomies without increasing the rate of perforation nor postoperative complications. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 May 4. [Medline].
Rao PM, Rhea JT, Rao JA, Conn AK. Plain abdominal radiography in clinically suspected appendicitis: diagnostic yield, resource use, and comparison with CT. Am J Emerg Med. 1999 Jul. 17(4):325-8. [Medline].
Whitley S, Sookur P, McLean A, Power N. The appendix on CT. Clin Radiol. 2009 Feb. 64(2):190-9. [Medline].
Repplinger MD, Weber AC, Pickhardt PJ, Rajamanickam VP, Svenson JE, Ehlenbach WJ, et al. Trends in the Use of Medical Imaging to Diagnose Appendicitis at an Academic Medical Center. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Apr 2. [Medline].
Pickhardt PJ, Lawrence EM, Pooler BD, Bruce RJ. Diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomography for suspected acute appendicitis. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jun 21. 154(12):789-96. [Medline].
Hof KH, Krestin GP, Steijerberg EW, Bonjer HJ, Lange JF, Becking WB, et al. Interobserver variability in CT scan interpretation for suspected acute appendicitis. Emerg Med J. 2009 Feb. 26(2):92-94. [Medline].
Tamburrini S, Brunetti A, Brown M, Sirlin C, Casola G. Acute appendicitis: diagnostic value of nonenhanced CT with selective use of contrast in routine clinical settings. Eur Radiol. Dec 16, 2006 [Epub ahead of print]. [Medline].
Balthazar EJ, Birnbaum BA, Yee J, et al. Acute appendicitis: CT and US correlation in 100 patients. Radiology. 1994 Jan. 190(1):31-5. [Medline].
Rao PM. Technical and interpretative pitfalls of appendiceal CT imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Aug. 171(2):419-25. [Medline].
Rao PM, Wittenberg J, McDowell RK, Rhea JT, Novelline RA. Appendicitis: use of arrowhead sign for diagnosis at CT. Radiology. 1997 Feb. 202(2):363-6. [Medline].
Rao PM, Feltmate CM, Rhea JT, et al. Helical computed tomography in differentiating appendicitis and acute gynecologic conditions. Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Mar. 93(3):417-21. [Medline].
Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA. Sensitivity and specificity of the individual CT signs of appendicitis: experience with 200 helical appendiceal CT examinations. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997 Sep-Oct. 21(5):686-92. [Medline].
Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, et al. Helical CT combined with contrast material administered only through the colon for imaging of suspected appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Nov. 169(5):1275-80. [Medline].
Sivit CJ, Applegate KE, Berlin SC, et al. Evaluation of suspected appendicitis in children and young adults: helical CT. Radiology. 2000 Aug. 216(2):430-3. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Malone AJ Jr, Wolf CR, Malmed AS, Melliere BF. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 Apr. 160(4):763-6. [Medline].
Lane MJ, Katz DS, Ross BA, et al. Unenhanced helical CT for suspected acute appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Feb. 168(2):405-9. [Medline].
Lane MJ, Liu DM, Huynh MD, Jeffrey RB Jr, Mindelzun RE, Katz DS. Suspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients. Radiology. 1999 Nov. 213(2):341-6. [Medline].
Ege G, Akman H, Sahin A, Bugra D, Kuzucu K. Diagnostic value of unenhanced helical CT in adult patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Br J Radiol. 2002 Sep. 75(897):721-5. [Medline].
in’t Hof KH, van Lankeren W, Krestin GP, Bonjer HJ, Lange JF, Becking WB. Surgical validation of unenhanced helical computed tomography in acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2004 Dec. 91(12):1641-5. [Medline].
Ashraf K, Ashraf O, Bari V, Rafique MZ, Usman MU, Chisti I. Role of focused appendiceal computed tomography in clinically equivocal acute appendicitis. J Pak Med Assoc. 2006 May. 56(5):200-3. [Medline].
Kaiser S, Finnbogason T, Jorulf HK, Söderman E, Frenckner B. Suspected appendicitis in children: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced versus nonenhanced Helical CT. Radiology. 2004 May. 231(2):427-33. [Medline].
Hoecker CC, Billman GF. The utility of unenhanced computed tomography in appendicitis in children. J Emerg Med. 2005 May. 28(4):415-21. [Medline].
Mun S, Ernst RD, Chen K, Oto A, Shah S, Mileski WJ. Rapid CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis with IV contrast material. Emerg Radiol. 2006 Mar. 12(3):99-102. [Medline].
Iwahashi N, Kitagawa Y, Mayumi T, Kohno H. Intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. World J Surg. 2005 Jan. 29(1):83-7. [Medline].
Anderson BA, Salem L, Flum DR. A systematic review of whether oral contrast is necessary for the computed tomography diagnosis of appendicitis in adults. Am J Surg. 2005 Sep. 190(3):474-8. [Medline].
Xiong B, Zhong B, Li Z, Zhou F, Hu R, Feng Z, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Noncontrast CT in Detecting Acute Appendicitis: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies. Am Surg. 2015 Jun. 81 (6):626-9. [Medline].
Incesu L, Coskun A, Selcuk MB, et al. Acute appendicitis: MR imaging and sonographic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Mar. 168(3):669-74. [Medline].
Hormann M, Paya K, Eibenberger K, et al. MR imaging in children with nonperforated acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced MR imaging in sonographically selected cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Aug. 171(2):467-70. [Medline].
Duke E, Kalb B, Arif-Tiwari H, Daye ZJ, Gilbertson-Dahdal D, Keim SM, et al. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of MRI for Evaluation of Acute Appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Mar. 206 (3):508-17. [Medline].
Pedrosa I, Levine D, Eyvazzadeh AD, Siewert B, Ngo L, Rofsky NM. MR imaging evaluation of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Radiology. 2006 Mar. 238(3):891-9. [Medline].
Burke LM, Bashir MR, Miller FH, Siegelman ES, Brown M, Alobaidy M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of acute appendicitis in pregnancy: a 5-year multiinstitutional study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul 26. [Medline].
Cobben L, Groot I, Kingma L, Coerkamp E, Puylaert J, Blickman J. A simple MRI protocol in patients with clinically suspected appendicitis: results in 138 patients and effect on outcome of appendectomy. Eur Radiol. 2009 Jan 10. [Medline].
Gracey D, McClure MJ. The impact of ultrasound in suspected acute appendicitis. Clin Radiol. 2007 Jun. 62(6):573-8. [Medline].
Jang KM, Lee K, Kim MJ, Yoon HS, Jeon EY, Koh SH, et al. What is the complementary role of ultrasound evaluation in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis after CT?. Eur J Radiol. 2009 Jan 12. [Medline].
Wan MJ, Krahn M, Ungar WJ, Caku E, Sung L, Medina LS, et al. Acute Appendicitis in Young Children: Cost-effectiveness of US versus CT in Diagnosis–A Markov Decision Analytic Model. Radiology. 2008 Dec 19. [Medline].
Puylaert JB. Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology. 1986 Feb. 158(2):355-60. [Medline].
van Randen A, Bipat S, Zwinderman AH, Ubbink DT, Stoker J, Boermeester MA. Acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of CT and graded compression US related to prevalence of disease. Radiology. 2008 Oct. 249(1):97-106. [Medline].
Krishnamoorthi R, Ramarajan N, Wang NE, Newman B, Rubesova E, Mueller CM, et al. Effectiveness of a staged US and CT protocol for the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis: reducing radiation exposure in the age of ALARA. Radiology. 2011 Apr. 259(1):231-9. [Medline].
Poortman P, Oostvogel HJ, Bosma E, et al. Improving diagnosis of acute appendicitis: results of a diagnostic pathway with standard use of ultrasonography followed by selective use of CT. J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Mar. 208(3):434-41. [Medline].
Mallin M, Craven P, Ockerse P, Steenblik J, Forbes B, Boehm K, et al. Diagnosis of appendicitis by bedside ultrasound in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar. 33 (3):430-2. [Medline].
Tatli F, Ekici U, Kanlioz M, Gozeneli O, Uzunkoy A, Yucel Y, et al. Ultrasonography in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Ital Chir. 2016. 87:152-4. [Medline].
Mostbeck G, Adam EJ, Nielsen MB, Claudon M, Clevert D, Nicolau C, et al. How to diagnose acute appendicitis: ultrasound first. Insights Imaging. 2016 Apr. 7 (2):255-63. [Medline].
Quillin SP, Siegel MJ. Appendicitis: efficacy of color Doppler sonography. Radiology. 1994 May. 191(2):557-60. [Medline].
Patriquin HB, Garcier JM, Lafortune M, et al. Appendicitis in children and young adults: Doppler sonographic-pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Mar. 166(3):629-33. [Medline].
Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P, et al. Outer diameter of the vermiform appendix as a sign of acute appendicitis: evaluation at US. Radiology. 2001 Mar. 218(3):757-62. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Tzanakis NE, Efstathiou SP, Danulidis K, Rallis GE, Tsioulos DI, Chatzivasiliou A. A new approach to accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis. World J Surg. 2005 Sep. 29(9):1151-6, discussion 1157. [Medline].
Navarro DA, Weber PM, Kang IY, dos Remedios LV, Jasko IA, Sawicki JE. Indium-111 leukocyte imaging in appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987 Apr. 148(4):733-6. [Medline].
Kipper SL. The role of radiolabeled leukocyte imaging in the management of patients with acute appendicitis. Q J Nucl Med. 1999 Mar. 43(1):83-92. [Medline].
Henneman PL, Marcus CS, Butler JA, Freedland ES, Wilson SE, Rothstein RJ. Appendicitis: evaluation by Tc-99m leukocyte scan. Ann Emerg Med. 1988 Feb. 17(2):111-6. [Medline].
Varoglu E, Polat KY, Tastekin G, Akçay F, Polat C. Diagnostic value of Tc-99m HIG scintigraphy in the detection of acute appendicitis. Clin Nucl Med. 1996 Aug. 21(8):645-7. [Medline].
Lutfi Incesu, MD Professor, Department of Radiology, Ondokuz Mayis University School of Medicine; Chief, Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Ondokuz Mayis University Hospital, Turkey
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Caroline R Taylor, MD Associate Professor, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine; Chief, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Health Care System
Caroline R Taylor, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Eugene C Lin, MD Attending Radiologist, Teaching Coordinator for Cardiac Imaging, Radiology Residency Program, Virginia Mason Medical Center; Clinical Assistant Professor of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine
Eugene C Lin, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Nuclear Medicine, American College of Radiology, Radiological Society of North America, Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Appendicitis Imaging
Research & References of Appendicitis Imaging|A&C Accounting And Tax Services
Source
0 Comments