Electrocardiography
No Results
No Results
processing….
The standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is one of the most commonly used medical studies in the assessment of cardiovascular disease. It is the most important test for interpretation of the cardiac rhythm, detection of myocardial ischemia and infarction, conduction system abnormalities, preexcitation, long QT syndromes, atrial abnormalities, ventricular hypertrophy, pericarditis, and other conditions. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] The use of standardized terminology is recommended to allow application of ECG diagnoses across many different hospital systems and countries. [6]
See Are You Missing Subtle MI Clues on ECGs? Test Your Skills, a Critical Images slideshow, to help identify a variety of ECG abnormalities.
The ECG has its roots in the seminal work of Galvani, who famously noted the contraction of frog legs when stimulated with electricity. [7] Although he was incorrect in attributing this phenomenon to “animal electricity,” his findings ushered in a period of research in the interaction of electricity and biological systems.
Matteucci, and later Kolliker and Muller, demonstrated that the electrical activity of a beating heart caused synchronous contractions in muscle preparations that were connected to the heart by nerve tissue. [8, 9] Gabriel Lippman developed the capillary electrometer, making it possible to measure the minute currents in biological systems. [10] With the Lippman electrometer, Agustus Waller performed the first ECG of a human heart at St Mary’s Hospital in London in May 1887. [11]
Willem Einthoven improved the ECG using the Lippman electrometer and then introduced the string galvanometer, which represented a great leap forward in electrocardiography. [12] With Einthoven’s improvements, the now familiar P, Q, R, S, and T waves were apparent.
Not only did Einthoven reveal the ECG waveforms as we know them today, but his convention for placement of the ECG leads is still in use, with leads on the right and left arms as well as the left leg, using the right leg as an electrical ground. With these leads, he demonstrated the well-known “Einthoven’s triangle” (see the image below).
One of Einthoven’s students, Sir Thomas Lewis, used electrocardiography to reveal the mechanisms behind atrial fibrillation and other conduction abnormalities. In the United States, Wilson and Goldberger pioneered the use of additional leads, namely aVR, aVL, aVF, and the 6 precordial leads (see the images below). [13, 14]
After these advancements, the ECG as we know it today was created and, except for advances in the technology, it has changed little over the last 50 years.
For more information, see the following resources:
For a concise review of the recognition of artifacts which may be introduced by lead misplacement, see Surawicz, B, Knilans T, Chou TC. Chou’s Electrocardiography in Clinical Practice: Adult and Pediatric. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders and Co; 2001:576-82.
For further information on the technical standards of ECG recording devices, the see the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) and the American National Standards Institute (ANSI).
The electrocardiogram (ECG) has proven to be among the most useful diagnostic tests in clinical medicine. It is routinely used in the evaluation of patients to detect myocardial injury, ischemia, and the presence of prior infarction, and in the assessment of patients with electrolyte abnormalities, drug toxicities, and implanted defibrillators and pacemakers.
In addition to its usefulness in the evaluation of ischemic coronary disease, the ECG, in conjunction with ambulatory ECG monitoring, is of particular use in the diagnosis of disorders of the cardiac rhythm and in the evaluation of syncope. Other common uses of the ECG include the assessment of metabolic disorders and side effects of pharmacotherapy, as well as the evaluation of primary and secondary cardiomyopathic processes, among others. [15]
No absolute contraindications to performing an ECG exist, other than patient refusal. Some patients may have allergies or, more commonly, sensitivities to the adhesive used to affix the leads; in these cases, hypoallergenic alternatives are available from various manufacturers.
The various components of an electrocardiogram (ECG) (ie, P wave, QRS complex, and T wave) have different and distinct amplitudes and frequencies. Devices that record these signals must make use of various signal filtering and amplification algorithms to produce a clinically useful signal while excluding unwanted signals (such as those resulting from skeletal muscle, respiratory variation, and electromagnetic interference from nearby equipment).
Currently, most ECG recording machines are digital (as opposed to the analog devices used previously). The American College of Cardiology (ACC), in conjunction with the American Heart Association (AHA) and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), have published guidelines regarding the technical standards for ECG recording equipment. [16] These machines can autogenerate preliminary findings based on morphology criteria.
In order to compensate for the effect of low-frequency signals, such as those due to chest wall movement with respiration, while also minimizing the effects of extraneous high frequency on the fidelity of the recordings, various filters must be applied to the raw electrical signal. For the current digital systems in use, these low-frequency and high-frequency cutoff values are 0.5 Hz and 150 Hz, respectively, for adult ECG. In pediatric ECG, the high-frequency filter should be increased to 250 Hz. Additional guidelines are given with respect to signal amplification, compression, and storage; these are beyond the scope of this article.
The standard 12-lead ECG is generally performed with the patient lying quietly in the supine position. Care should be taken to ensure that the skin is clean and trimmed of excess hair in the areas in which the leads are to be placed. In some instances, a mild abrasive pad can be used to prepare the skin in these areas to aid in apposition of the leads.
After preparation of the patient, apply the electrocardiographic (ECG) leads in the manner outlined below.
It is recommended that the standard limb leads are placed one on each limb distal to the shoulders and hips, but they do not necessarily need to be as far distal as the wrists and ankles. [16] Next, apply the precordial leads, taking care to be as precise as possible in their positioning.
Lead V1 is placed at the fourth intercostal space at the right sternal border. [16] Lead V2 is placed at the left sternal border directly across from lead V1, also in the fourth intercostal space. Lead V4 is placed in the fifth intercostal space at the mid clavicular line, and then lead V3 can be placed midway between leads V2 and V4. Lead V6 is placed in the horizontal plane of V4 at the mid-axillary line, and then lead V5 is placed in the same horizontal plane as that of lead V4 in the anterior axillary line or midway between leads V4 and V6 when the anterior axillary line is not readily discernible.
Note that precordial electrode placement in women with large breasts can be problematic due to obfuscation of bony landmarks. Therefore, it is recommended that the electrodes be placed beneath, rather than overlying, the breast. [16]
The importance of proper lead placement cannot be stressed enough. Furthermore, properly trained ECG technologists have been noted to be more likely to properly place the leads than are nurses or physicians, including cardiologists. [17] Improper placement of the leads can yield a tracing that gives the appearance of disease where none is present or vice versa. [18]
Once the ECG is completed, it should be reviewed by the operator. If significant issues with the quality of the tracing exist, the cause of the issue should be addressed and the tracing repeated. When this is impractical or impossible, the clinician ordering or reading the ECG should be notified for further guidance.
After having obtained an acceptable tracing, remove the ECG leads and help the patient off the examination table. In the event that the adhesive from the electrodes is not easily removed from the skin, the patient may be given an alcohol pad or moist paper towel to aid in its removal.
The initial review of the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) should encompass the following: heart rate and rhythm, P-QRS-T morphology, presence of ST segment, and PR-QRS-QT intervals (see the image below). Each ECG should be thoroughly analyzed (“read”) in a systematic fashion to avoid overlooking important abnormalities. The following steps are important to consider:
In the image below, the ECG is recorded on standard paper with large boxes in heavy lines of 0.5 cm on the sides. On the horizontal axis, each large box represents 0.2 seconds at a typical paper speed of 25 mm per second, which is then divided into five smaller boxes that each represent 0.04 seconds. On the vertical axis, the large box consists of five subdivisions, each of which is 1 mm in height. In standard calibration, each 10 mm equals 1 mV. The normal heart rate ranges from 60 to 100 per minute; rates below 60 per minute and, occasionally, lower than 50 per minute are routinely seen in seasoned athletes.
When the cardiac rhythm is regular, the heart rate can be determined by the interval between two successive QRS complexes. On standard paper with the most common tracing settings, the heart rate is calculated by dividing the number of large boxes (5 mm or 0.2 seconds) between two successive QRS complexes into 300. For example, if the interval between two QRS complexes is two large boxes, then the rate is 150 beats per minute (bpm) (300 ÷ 2 = 150 bpm). See the following images.
If the heart rate is irregular, count the number of QRS complexes on the ECG and multiply by 6 to obtain the average heart rate in bpm (the ECG displays a period of 10 seconds; thus, 6 × 10 seconds = 60 seconds [1 minute]).
The P wave represents atrial depolarization. The normal P wave morphology is upright in leads I, II, and aVF, but it is inverted in lead aVR. The P wave is typically biphasic in lead V1 (positive-negative), but when the negative terminal component of the P wave exceeds 0.04 seconds in duration (equivalent to one small box), it is abnormal.
Left atrial enlargement should be suspected when the P wave duration is increased; it is associated with being more than one small box deep (>1 mm2) in lead V1 and a bifid P wave in lead II with a duration that is longer than 110 seconds. [19] Right atrial enlargement is associated with a peaked P wave taller than 2.5 mm in the inferior leads and more than 1.5 mm tall in leads V1 and V2. [20]
The PR interval incorporates the time from the depolarization of the sinus node to the onset of ventricular depolarization. The measurement starts from the beginning of the P wave to the first part of the QRS complex, with a normal duration between 0.12 to 0.20 seconds. [6]
The QRS duration represents the time for ventricular depolarization. The duration is normally 0.06 to 0.10 seconds. Q waves are inscribed when the initial QRS vector is directed away from the positive electrode. The R wave is the first positive deflection of the QRS complex; its amplitude varies by age, race, and cardiac pathology, and it should increase across the precordium from leads V1 to V5. The negative deflection after the R wave is the S wave.
The ST segment is an interval between ventricular depolarization and ventricular repolarization. It is identified as the end of the QRS complex to the beginning of the T wave.
The end of the T wave to the beginning of the P wave is described as the TP segment, which is the zero potential or isoelectric point. The amount of elevation or depression in millimeters is relative to the TP segment.
The J point is located at the junction between the end of the QRS complex and the beginning of the ST segment. J-point elevation is known as an Osborne wave, which represents distortion of the earlierst phase of membrane repolarization, and it is associated with hypothermia.
Myocardial ischemia diagnosed by ECG is an integral part of the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treatment pathway and allows patient stratification into ST-segment elevation ACS (STE-ACS) and non-ST-segment elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS). [4, 21, 22] ST-segment wave changes may be in association with disease states such as acute ischemia, myocardial injury, pericarditis, and intraventricular conduction delays.
In the absence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and left bundle branch block (LBBB), new ST-segment elevation in upward convexity are signs of myocardial infarction (typically 60 msec following the J point in two contiguous leads [with cut-off points in leads V2-V3 of ≥0.2 mV in men ≥40 years, ≥0.25 mV in men ˂40 years, or ≥0.15 mV in women, and/or 0.1 mV in other leads for both men and women]). [23] New horizontal or down sloping ST depression that is 0.05 mV or more in two contiguous leads and/or T-wave inversion that is 0.1 mV or more in two contiguous leads, with a prominent R wave or an R/S ratio over 1, are also signs of myocardial infarction.
Coronary spasm may be associated with angina (Prinzmetal) and with transient ST-segment elevation in a coronary artery branch distribution that has the spasm.
Pericarditis is associated with ECG manifestations of diffuse upward concave ST-segment elevation with PR depressions.
See the following images.
The QT interval measures the depolarization and repolarization of the ventricles. QT prolongation is associated with development of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death. [24] It is commonly caused by various medications or can be a manifestation of an underlying ion channelopathy.
The QT interval is dependent on the heart rate. A faster heart rate leads to a shorter QT interval, whereas a slower heart rate leads to a longer QT interval. A corrected QT interval (QTc) corrects for the variations in heart rate. QTcb is the QT interval divided by the square root of the RR interval in seconds when using the Bazett formula. The normal value of for QTcb in men is 0.44 seconds or less; in women, it is 0.46 seconds or less. [25]
The QRS axis represents the major vector of ventricular activation, which is the overall direction of electrical activity. The electrical activity in healthy individuals starts at the sinoatrial node and spreads to the atrioventricular node down the Bundle of His, followed by conduction through the left and right bundle branches, and then to the Purkinje fibers to cause ventricular contraction. A positive deflection is when the direction of the overal electrical activity is toward that lead. Therefore, the cardiac axis may provide the overall direction of electrical activity when the ventricles depolarize. The normal cardiac axis is expected to lie between -30º and 90º, which means the overall direction of electrical activity is toward leads I, II, and III.
The electrical axis can be estimated from the standard frontal leads. There are shortcut methods to determine the axis. For example, if the QRS complex is upright in both leads I and II, then the axis must fall somewhere between -30º and 90º and the axis is normal.
If the complexes are negative in lead I and positive in lead aVF, then the axis is rightward. If the complexes are positive in lead I but negative in lead II, then the axis is leftward. If the complexes are negative in both leads I and aVF, then the axis is extreme.
The causes of left axis deviation include normal variation, left ventricular hypertrophy, left anterior fascicular block, congenital heart disease with primum atrial septal defect or endocardial cushion defect, ventricular ectopic beats, and preexcitation syndromes. [26]
The causes of right axis deviation include normal variation, right ventricular hypertrophy, left posterior fascicular block, ventricular ectopic beats, preexcitation, and dextrocardia. [26]
The R wave should progress in size across leads V1 to V6. Normally, in lead V1, there is a small R wave with a deep S wave; the R-wave amplitude should increase in size with the transition zone, normally in leads V2 to V4. Poor or late R-wave progression consists of a transition zone in lead V5 or V6, and it can be a sign of a previous anterior myocardial infarction. [27]
Bayes de Luna A. Basic Electrocardiography: Normal and Abnormal ECG Patterns. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2007.
Goldberger AL. Clinical Electrocardiography: A Simplified Approach. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby-Elsevier; 2006.
Baltazar RF. Basic and Bedside Electrocardiography. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.
[Guideline] Wagner GS, Macfarlane P, Wellens H, et al, for the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part VI: acute ischemia/infarction: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Mar 17. 53 (11):1003-11. [Medline].
Bonow RO, Mann DL, Zipes DP, Libby P, eds. Braunwald’s Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2012. 126-65.
[Guideline] Mason JW, Hancock EW, Gettes LS, et al, for the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, et al. Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part II: electrocardiography diagnostic statement list a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Mar 13. 49 (10):1128-35. [Medline].
Galvani A. De Viribus Electricitatis in Motu Musculari. Commentarius [Latin]. Bologna, Italy: Ex Typographia Instituti Scientiarium; 1791. 7363-418.
Matteucci C. [Sur un phenomene physiologique produit par les muscles en contraction] [French]. Ann Chim Phys. 1842. 6:339-41.
Kolliker A, Muller H. [Nachweis der negativen schwankung des muskelstromes am naturlich sich contrahieden muskel verhandl] [German]. J Phys Med Gesellsch. 1856. 6:494.
Lippmann G. [Relations entre les phenomenes electriques et capillaries] [French]. Ann Chim Phys. 1875. 5:494.
Waller AD. A demonstration on man of electromotive changes accompanying the heart’s beat. J Physiol. 1887 Oct. 8 (5):229-34. [Medline].
Einthoven W. [Un nouveau galvanometre] [French]. Arch Neerl Sci Exactes Nat. 1901. 6:625-33.
Wilson FN, Johnston FD, Macleod AG, Barker PS. Electrocardiograms that represent the potential variations of a single electrode. Am Heart J. 1934. 9(4):447-58.
Goldberger E. A simple, indifferent, electrocardiographic electrode of zero potential and a technique of obtaining augmented, unipolar, extremity leads. Am Heart J. 1942 Apr. 23(4):483-92.
[Guideline] Schlant RC, Adolph RJ, DiMarco JP, et al. Guidelines for electrocardiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Committee on Electrocardiography). Circulation. 1992 Mar. 85 (3):1221-8. [Medline].
[Guideline] Kligfield P, Gettes LS, Bailey JJ, et al, for the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, et al. Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram. Part I: The electrocardiogram and its technology. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Heart Rhythm. 2007 Mar. 4 (3):394-412. [Medline].
Rajaganeshan R, Ludlam CL, Francis DP, Parasramka SV, Sutton R. Accuracy in ECG lead placement among technicians, nurses, general physicians and cardiologists. Int J Clin Pract. 2008 Jan. 62 (1):65-70. [Medline].
Schijvenaars BJ, Kors JA, van Herpen G, Kornreich F, van Bemmel JH. Effect of electrode positioning on ECG interpretation by computer. J Electrocardiol. 1997 Jul. 30 (3):247-56. [Medline].
Edhouse J, Thakur RK, Khalil JM. ABC of clinical electrocardiography. Conditions affecting the left side of the heart. BMJ. 2002 May 25. 324 (7348):1264-7. [Medline].
Harrigan RA, Jones K. ABC of clinical electrocardiography. Conditions affecting the right side of the heart. BMJ. 2002 May 18. 324 (7347):1201-4. [Medline].
[Guideline] O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al, for the American College of Emergency Physicians, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jan 29. 61 (4):e78-140. [Medline].
Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD, for the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2007 Oct. 28 (20):2525-38. [Medline].
[Guideline] Rautaharju PM, Surawicz B, Gettes LS, et al, for the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part IV: the ST segment, T and U waves, and the QT interval: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Mar 17. 53 (11):982-91. [Medline].
[Guideline] Priori SG, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Mazzanti A, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: The Task Force for the Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). Eur Heart J. 2015 Nov 1. 36 (41):2793-867. [Medline].
Roden DM. Clinical practice. Long-QT syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 10. 358 (2):169-76. [Medline].
[Guideline] Hancock EW, Deal BJ, Mirvis DM, et al, for the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part V: electrocardiogram changes associated with cardiac chamber hypertrophy: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society: endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. Circulation. 2009 Mar 17. 119 (10):e251-61. [Medline].
Gami AS, Holly TA, Rosenthal JE. Electrocardiographic poor R-wave progression: analysis of multiple criteria reveals little usefulness. Am Heart J. 2004 Jul. 148 (1):80-5. [Medline].
Einthoven W. [Le telecardiogramme] [French]. Arch Int de Physiol. 1906. 4:132-64.
Bouzas-Mosquera A, Peteiro J, Broullon FJ, et al. Incremental value of exercise echocardiography over exercise electrocardiography in a chest pain unit. Eur J Intern Med. 2015 Nov. 26 (9):720-5. [Medline].
Triggiani AI, Valenzano A, Ciliberti MA, et al. Heart rate variability is reduced in underweight and overweight healthy adult women. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2017 Mar. 37 (2):162-7. [Medline].
[Guideline] Hauk L. ECG, echocardiography, or MPI for cardiac screening: guidance from the ACP. Am Fam Physician. 2015 Sep 15. 92 (6):531. [Medline].
[Guideline] Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al, for the ACC/AHA Task Force Members. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014 Dec 23. 130 (25):e344-426. [Medline].
[Guideline] Surawicz B, Childers R, Deal BJ, et al, for the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part III: intraventricular conduction disturbances: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Mar 17. 53 (11):976-81. [Medline].
Funk M, Fennie KP, Stephens KE, et al, for the PULSE Site Investigators. Association of implementation of practice standards for electrocardiographic monitoring with Nurses’ knowledge, quality of care, and patient outcomes: findings from the Practical Use of the Latest Standards of Electrocardiography (PULSE) Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Feb. 10 (2):53. [Medline].
Breen C, Bond R, Finlay D. A clinical decision support tool to assist with the interpretation of the 12-lead electrocardiogram. Health Informatics J. 2017 Jan 1. 1460458216683534. [Medline].
Hartman ND, Wheaton NB, Williamson K, Quattromani EN, Branzetti JB, Aldeen AZ. A novel tool for assessment of emergency medicine resident skill in determining diagnosis and management for emergent electrocardiograms: a multicenter study. J Emerg Med. 2016 Dec. 51 (6):697-704. [Medline].
Yeo TJ, Sharma S. Using the 12-lead electrocardiogram in the care of athletic patients. Cardiol Clin. 2016 Nov. 34 (4):543-55. [Medline].
Huitema AA, Zhu T, Alemayehu M, Lavi S. Diagnostic accuracy of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction by various healthcare providers. Int J Cardiol. 2014 Dec 20. 177 (3):825-9. [Medline].
Sibbald M, Davies EG, Dorian P, Yu EH. Electrocardiographic interpretation skills of cardiology residents: are they competent?. Can J Cardiol. 2014 Dec. 30 (12):1721-4. [Medline].
Drezner JA. Standardised criteria for ECG interpretation in athletes: a practical tool. Br J Sports Med. 2012 Nov. 46 suppl 1:i6-8. [Medline].
Gregg RE, Deluca DC, Chien CH, Helfenbein ED, Ariet M. Automated serial ECG comparison improves computerized interpretation of 12-lead ECG. J Electrocardiol. 2012 Nov-Dec. 45 (6):561-5. [Medline].
Farooqi KM, Ceresnak SR, Freeman K, Pass RH. Electrocardiograms transmitted via facsimile may not allow accurate interval interpretation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Oct. 34 (10):1283-7. [Medline].
Uberoi A, Stein R, Perez MV, et al. Interpretation of the electrocardiogram of young athletes. Circulation. 2011 Aug 9. 124 (6):746-57. [Medline].
Magnani JW, Johnson VM, Sullivan LM, et al. P-wave indices: derivation of reference values from the Framingham Heart Study. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2010 Oct. 15 (4):344-52. [Medline].
Clark EN, Sejersten M, Clemmensen P, Macfarlane PW. Automated electrocardiogram interpretation programs versus cardiologists’ triage decision making based on teletransmitted data in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2010 Dec 15. 106 (12):1696-702. [Medline].
Tarek Ajam, MD, MS Fellow in Cardiovascular Medicine, Aurora Health Care
Tarek Ajam, MD, MS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Cardiology, American College of Physicians, Syrian American Medical Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Ali A Mehdirad, MD, FACC Harlene and Marvin Wool Endowed Professor of Cardiology, Professor of Medicine, Director, Electrophysiology Service, St Louis University School of Medicine
Ali A Mehdirad, MD, FACC is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Cardiology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Mary L Windle, PharmD Adjunct Associate Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Richard A Lange, MD, MBA President, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Dean, Paul L Foster School of Medicine
Richard A Lange, MD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, Association of Subspecialty Professors
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Ethan Levine, DO Director of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Arnot Ogden Medical Center
Ethan Levine, DO is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, Heart Rhythm Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Electrocardiography
Research & References of Electrocardiography|A&C Accounting And Tax Services
Source
0 Comments