Imaging in Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis

by promotiondept | Mar 5, 2019 | Uncategorized | 0 comments

All Premium Themes And WEBSITE Utilities Tools You Ever Need! Greatest 100% Free Bonuses With Any Purchase.

Greatest CYBER MONDAY SALES with Bonuses are offered to following date: Get Started For Free!
Purchase Any Product Today! Premium Bonuses More Than $10,997 Will Be Emailed To You To Keep Even Just For Trying It Out.
Click Here To See Greatest Bonuses

and Try Out Any Today!

Here’s the deal.. if you buy any product(s) Linked from this sitewww.Knowledge-Easy.com including Clickbank products, as long as not Google’s product ads, I am gonna Send ALL to you absolutely FREE!. That’s right, you WILL OWN ALL THE PRODUCTS, for Now, just follow these instructions:

1. Order the product(s) you want by click here and select the Top Product, Top Skill you like on this site ..

2. Automatically send you bonuses or simply send me your receipt to consultingadvantages@yahoo.com Or just Enter name and your email in the form at the Bonus Details.

3. I will validate your purchases. AND Send Themes, ALL 50 Greatests Plus The Ultimate Marketing Weapon & “WEBMASTER’S SURVIVAL KIT” to you include ALL Others are YOURS to keep even you return your purchase. No Questions Asked! High Classic Guaranteed for you! Download All Items At One Place.

That’s it !

*Also Unconditionally, NO RISK WHAT SO EVER with Any Product you buy this website,

60 Days Money Back Guarantee,

IF NOT HAPPY FOR ANY REASON, FUL REFUND, No Questions Asked!

Download Instantly in Hands Top Rated today!

Remember, you really have nothing to lose if the item you purchased is not right for you! Keep All The Bonuses.

Super Premium Bonuses Are Limited Time Only!

Day(s)

Hour(s)

Minute(s)

Second(s)

Get Paid To Use Facebook, Twitter and YouTube
Online Social Media Jobs Pay $25 - $50/Hour.
No Experience Required. Work At Home, $316/day!
View 1000s of companies hiring writers now!
Order Now!

MOST POPULAR

*****
Customer Support Chat Job: $25/hr
Chat On Twitter Job - $25/hr
Get Paid to chat with customers on
a business’s Twitter account.
Try Free Now!

Get Paid To Review Apps On Phone
Want to get paid $810 per week online?
Get Paid To Review Perfect Apps Weekly.
Order Now!

Look For REAL Online Job?
Get Paid To Write Articles $200/day
View 1000s of companies hiring writers now!
Try-Out Free Now!

How To Develop Your Skill For Great Success And Happiness Including Become CPA? | Additional special tips From Admin

Competence Development is usually the number 1 crucial and most important element of achieving true success in all professions as you saw in our own culture as well as in Globally. Hence happy to talk about together with everyone in the right after relating to what precisely effective Skill level Expansion is; just how or what ways we do the job to enjoy desires and ultimately one is going to operate with what anyone takes pleasure in to complete any time of day designed for a comprehensive life. Is it so terrific if you are confident enough to cultivate resourcefully and get achievement in the things you dreamed, in-line for, follower of rules and functioned really hard any day time and obviously you come to be a CPA, Attorney, an owner of a great manufacturer or even a healthcare professional who can certainly seriously bring about fantastic benefit and principles to many people, who many, any world and local community undoubtedly esteemed and respected. I can's think I can support others to be main expert level who seem to will add vital answers and pain relief values to society and communities today. How happy are you if you grown to be one like so with your own name on the label? I have got there at SUCCESS and prevail over all of the hard elements which is passing the CPA exams to be CPA. On top of that, we will also include what are the risks, or various other complications that might be on your option and just how I have privately experienced all of them and is going to exhibit you methods to prevail over them. | From Admin and Read More at Cont'.

Imaging in Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis

No Results

processing….

Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HPS) is commonly encountered in pediatric practice. The typical infant presents with nonbilious projectile vomiting and dehydration (with hypochloremic hypokalemic metabolic alkalosis) if the diagnosis is delayed. The presentation age of preterm infants is defined less clearly. Studies suggest that preterm infants may present with HPS symptoms at a later chronological age than term infants.^{[1, 2]} Stark et al reported a series of 2466 newborns with HPS, 208 (8.43%) of whom were premature. Chronological age at presentation was found generally to increase as gestational age decreased. Preterm birth was associated with longer interval from birth to presentation with HPS (median [IQR] days of 40 [30-56] vs. 33 [26–45] in full-term infants; P<0.001).<ref>2</ref> HPS occurs in infants usually in the first 2 months of life and is rare in infants older than 6 months.^{[3, 4]}

This condition accounts for one third of nonbilious vomiting occurrences in infants and is the most common reason for laparotomy before age 1 year.^[5]A striking male preponderance is seen, with a male-to-female ratio of 4-6:1. In addition, pyloric stenosis and esophageal atresia may coexist.^{[6, 7]} HPS occurs in 2-5 per 1000 infants. While the etiology remains elusive, a multivariate cause including genetic and environmental exposures is accepted. It has a predilection for male infants, first-born infants, and those born to younger mothers. It is also associated with smoking, postnatal erythromycin administration^[8], and bottle feeding. Viral etiologies have also been postulated.^[9]McAteer et al showed the association with bottle feeding to be greater in older and multiparous mothers.^[10]

Approximately 300 cases of adult-onset idiopathic hypertrophic pyloric stenosis have been reported. The most common clinical symptom is abdominal distention relieved by vomiting. In adults, upper gastrointestinal barium series and upper endoscopy are used to confirm the diagnosis and to rule out possible malignant disease.^{[11, 12]}

Midgut volvulus is part of the differential diagnosis for high intestinal obstruction; however, other conditions to be considered include malrotation, with or without midgut volvulus; antral polyps; gastric duplication; focal foveolar hyperplasia; and pylorospasm.

In hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, the circular muscle layer becomes thickened, which narrows the pyloric channel and elongates the pylorus. During this process, the mucosa becomes redundant and may appear hypertrophic. With elongation and thickening of the muscle, the pylorus deviates upward toward the gallbladder, which serves as a marker, because in hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, the pylorus can be seen adjacent to the gallbladder and anteromedial to the right kidney. The thickened pylorus narrows the pyloric channel, resulting in gastric outlet obstruction, gastric distention, and retrograde peristalsis in the stomach.

In the past and with experience,^{[13, 14]}the pyloric olive, which represents the thickened and elongated pylorus, was said to be felt by surgeons in up to 80% of patients. Review of the more recent radiologic and surgical literature indicates that the olive currently is felt much less frequently (23% of the time in one reported case series).

The low rate of positive palpation for the pyloric olive may be the result of several factors. Patients present at an earlier age when the olive is smaller; with earlier presentation, the incidences of dehydration, metabolic alkalosis, weight loss, and failure to thrive as manifestations of HPS decrease dramatically.^[15]Consequently, infants who present at a younger age are better nourished such that abdominal wall fat may obscure palpation of the mass. In addition, the skill of palpation may become lost as more medical school graduates come to rely heavily on ultrasonography for diagnosis.^[16]

A peristaltic wave through the stomach may also be observed during visual inspection of the abdomen.^[17]

The preferred diagnostic test for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis is a contentious topic, with a wealth of articles that discuss the cost-effectiveness and the changing face of this disease.^{[18, 19, 20]}

The first and most important step in patient workup of suspected hypertrophic pyloric stenosis is a thorough physical examination. If the pyloric olive is felt (see Clinical Details, above), the patient may proceed directly to the operating room without imaging.^[14]However, many surgeons are uncomfortable with this protocol because a false-positive physical examination then leads to a negative laparotomy. Therefore, ultrasonography is recommended, because its sensitivity and specificity are close to 100% for this disease.^{[21, 22, 23]}If the clinical suspicion for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis is moderate to high, ultrasonography is also recommended. (See the images below.)

If the vomiting infant is outside the usual age range for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis or if the clinical suspicion is low, an upper GI study is recommended, because this study more effectively rules out other problems, such as malrotation and gastroesophageal reflux.^[20](See the images below).

Some investigators have reported that a UGI study is the most cost-effective study^[19](more than ultrasonography) in the vomiting infant, because a negative ultrasonogram often leads to a UGI study to evaluate other diagnoses that a focused ultrasonographic evaluation does not detect.^[20]A second test, such as ultrasonography, rarely follows a negative UGI study for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.^{[19, 20]}

In experienced hands, ultrasonography is the preferred modality in the workup of any vomiting infant. The technique includes feeding glucose water to the baby, which often improves visualization of the pylorus and, in the case of a negative study, allows continuous observation of the gastroesophageal junction to diagnose reflux. The radiologist’s skill and clinical suspicion ultimately determine which test is appropriate.

Ultrasonography has high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in the diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. However, errors in diagnosis do occur and relate to false negatives and false positives

False negatives may result from operator inexperience, in which the pylorus may not be identified. Another cause may be from distended fluid and gas-filled stomach. These cause the pylorus to fold backward on itself such that it may remain hidden behind the stomach. The overdistended antrum may be mistaken for the pylorus; in such cases and in any infant whose pylorus is not visualized on ultrasonogram, one should place a nasogastric tube and withdraw the gastric secretions.

Muscle thickness increases with patient size, and borderline measurements are seen early in the disease and with premature infants, which may also cause false-negative findings. Some authors report an increase in muscle thickness with fluid resuscitation.^[24]Observation and repeat ultrasound examination in 2-3 days can confirm the diagnosis if the patient is stable.

False positives may result from pylorospasm, a dynamic process that changes over time. The normal pylorus opens at least once every 15 minutes. The thickened muscle and elongated pylorus should be fixed. In addition, the postoperative appearance of the pylorus can lead to false-positive findings. Symptoms may take time to clear and, therefore, so do the abnormalities on ultrasonography. This modality may show hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (thickened muscle thickness) for up to 12 weeks following pyloromyotomy. In these cases, a UGI study may provide more information than ultrasonography in the evaluation of incomplete myotomy.

The following are issues that may arise in a child with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis:

Failure to choose the best test, which is dictated by patient history, physical examination, and the surgeon’s level of suspicion.

Failure to choose the best radiologic investigation for the vomiting infant. If imaging is requested despite a child having a palpable pyloric olive, confirm hypertrophic pyloric stenosis by ultrasonography.

If the clinical history suggests hypertrophic pyloric stenosis and the child is stable, perform ultrasonography to diagnose or exclude this condition. If the ultrasonographic findings are negative, perform a UGI study to confirm or rule out other pathology.

Ultrasonography, although reliable for diagnosing hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, may miss malrotation, which is the most serious cause of vomiting in infants. These children require a UGI examination. Thus, if concern exists about malrotation, with or without volvulus (no olive is felt; patient is sick), a UGI study is necessary.

Abdominal radiographs may show a fluid-filled or air-distended stomach, suggesting the presence of gastric outlet obstruction. A markedly dilated stomach with exaggerated incisura (caterpillar sign) may be seen, which represents increased gastric peristalsis in these patients (see the image below).^[25]This peristaltic wave may be seen on visual inspection of the abdomen.^[17]If the patient has recently vomited or has a nasogastric tube in place, the stomach is decompressed and the radiographic findings are normal.

A UGI study was once considered the test of choice for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Findings on UGI studies include the following:

Delayed gastric emptying (if severe, this may prevent barium from passing into the pylorus and severely limit the study)

Cephalic orientation of the pylorus

Shouldering (ie, filling defect at the antrum created by prolapse of the hypertrophic muscle)

Mushroom or umbrella sign (ie, thickened muscle that indents the duodenal bulb; the name refers to the impression made by the hypertrophic pylorus on the duodenum)

Double-track sign (ie, redundant mucosa in the narrowed pyloric lumen, which results in separation of the barium column into 2 channels) (see the image below)

String sign (ie, barium passing through the narrowed channel, creating a single, markedly attenuated, and elongated track) (see the following image)

Pyloric teat (ie, outpouching created by distortion of the lesser curve by the hypertrophied muscle)

Retained secretions and retrograde peristalsis

Plain film radiography provides a low degree of confidence in making the diagnosis of, or in ruling out, hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. A UGI study has high sensitivity (>90%) and low specificity.

High intestinal obstruction can be seen with midgut volvulus, duodenal obstruction (from stenosis, duodenal web, annular pancreas), gastric outlet obstruction caused by focal foveolar hyperplasia, and eosinophilic gastroenteritis, among others. False-negative radiographs can be seen in a child who has recently vomited.

Ultrasonography is important in the diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis and has likely contributed to the changing face of the disease, because this modality results in earlier diagnosis and treatment owing to the accessibility and accuracy of ultrasonography.^[15]This modality is the method of choice for both the diagnosis and exclusion of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, because ultrasonography has a sensitivity and specificity of approximately 100%.^{[21, 22, 24, 26]}Thus, ultrasonography is also recommended in patients whose disease is clinically suspected but in whom the pyloric olive cannot be felt.^{[14, 21, 27, 28, 29, 30]}

In a study by Leaphart et al, ultrasonography confirmed hypertrophic pyloric stenosis when the pyloric muscle thickness (MT) was greater than 4 mm and the pyloric channel length (CL) was greater than 15 mm.^[31]The investigators studied the diagnostic criteria for this disease in newborns younger than 21 days from 2000 to 2006 and found that ultrasonographic measurement of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis was significantly decreased in younger patients (MT, 3.7 +/- 0.65 mm; CL, 16.9 +/- 2.8 mm) versus older newborns (MT, 4.6 +/- 0.82 mm; CL, 18.2 +/- 3.4 mm). Of important note, the mean ultrasonographic measurement for young newborns with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis typically fell within the range currently defined as normal or borderline.^[31]A linear relationship existed between pyloric MT and CL and patient age, suggesting that 3.5 mm MT be considered the cutoff in younger patients.^[31]

Ultrasonography is performed with a 7.5- to 13.5-MHz linear transducer in the supine child. Transverse images at the epigastrium identify the pylorus to the left of the gallbladder and anteromedial to the right kidney (see the image below). A distended stomach, however, displaces and distorts the pylorus and may require the placement of a nasogastric tube to withdraw the stomach’s contents. A gastric aspirate of more than 5 mL in a baby who has been without oral intake (NPO) for several hours indicates gastric outlet obstruction. Right posterior oblique positioning and scanning from a posterior approach may help improve visualization of the pylorus.^[32]

Ultrasonographic signs of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, originally described in 1977^[33]and further defined, are as follows:

An MT (serosa to mucosa) greater than 3 mm (a correlation between MT and the patient’s age exists; the most reliable ultrasonographic sign is an MT greater than 3 mm. Because this measurement can be increased falsely with off-axis imaging, attention to technique is important.)

Target sign on transverse images of the pylorus (see the following image)

Pyloric channel length greater than 17 mm

Pyloric thickness (serosa to serosa) of 15 mm or greater

Failure of the channel to open during a minimum of 15 minutes of scanning

Retrograde or hyperperistaltic contractions

Antral nipple sign^[34](ie, a prolapse of redundant mucosa into the antrum, which creates a pseudomass) (see the image below)

Double-track sign on ultrasonography^{[35, 36]}(ie, redundant mucosa in the narrowed lumen, which creates 2 mucosal outlines)

Other findings include reversible portal venous gas; nonuniform echogenicity of the pyloric muscle

A positive hypertrophic pyloric stenosis finding by ultrasonography almost always indicates this condition is present. A negative examination can be false in a patient who is seen early in the disease or in a younger patient whose MT is less than 3 mm.

Many articles since Teele and Smith’s original description of the ultrasound diagnosis of HPS have justified measurement criteria based on each group’s specificity, sensitivity, and positive predictive value. Values reported in the literature range from an MT of 2.5 to 4 mm or thicker and a CL of 14 to 19 mm. The risk of a false-positive test may result in a negative laparotomy. Forman concludes that an MT of 4 mm and a CL of 16-20 mm may decrease sensitivity for HPS, but these thresholds avoid a negative laparotomy.^[37]The authors comment that a patient with a normal ultrasound, based on these criteria, and persistent symptoms may be reevaluated. Of note, as discussed above, younger infants may have relatively smaller measurements of the pylorus in the setting of HPS.

The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis is high. Sensitivity and specificity approach 100%.^{[21, 22]}Possible sources of false negatives are an overdistended stomach (the pylorus is hidden behind the antrum), failure to identify the pylorus (eg, operator inexperience in performing ultrasonography for evaluation of this condition), and a small infant or early presentation.

Iqbal et al showed that age and weight correlate positively with ultrasound measurement of the pylorus in pyloric stenosis and that it did not affect the diagnostic criteria. In their series of 318 ultrasound studies, there was 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity for HPS when either the pyloric channel thickness or length of 3 mm and 15 mm, respectively, were met. Further, they demonstrated a negative correlation between pyloric measurement, age, and weight when the pylorus was normal.^[38]If a question remains, follow-up ultrasound can be performed in a few days to reassess muscle thickness.

Another possible source for false-positive findings is pylorospasm (typically transient). In this scenario, one should wait up to 15 minutes and remeasure the muscle to avoid mistaking muscle spasm for hypertrophy.

Although a false-negative clinical diagnosis causes diagnostic delay, a false-positive diagnosis results in a negative laparotomy. Therefore, imaging has become more important in the diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.

Nuclear medicine scanning is not routinely used for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis; however, possible findings include delayed gastric emptying. The degree of confidence is poor. Nuclear medicine scanning has a high sensitivity but low specificity for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.

Costanzo CM, Vinocur C, Berman L. Prematurity Affects Age of Presentation of Pyloric Stenosis. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2017 Feb. 56 (2):127-131. [Medline].

Stark CM, Rogers PL, Eberly MD, Nylund CM. Association of prematurity with the development of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Pediatr Res. 2015 Aug. 78 (2):218-22. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Vermes G, László D, Czeizel AE, Ács N. Maternal Factors in the Origin of Infantile Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis – a Population-based Case-control Study. Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2015 Sep 22. [Medline].

Vermes G, Mátrai Á, Czeizel AE, Ács N. Birth outcomes of male and female patients with infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis – a population-based case-control study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 Aug 10. 1-6. [Medline].

Georgoula C, Gardiner M. Pyloric stenosis a 100 years after Ramstedt. Arch Dis Child. 2012 Aug. 97(8):741-5. [Medline].

Magilner AD. Esophageal atresia and hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: sequential coexistence of disease (case report). AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986 Aug. 147(2):329-30. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Sommerfield T, Chalmers J, Youngson G, Heeley C, Fleming M, Thomson G. The changing epidemiology of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in Scotland. Arch Dis Child. 2008 Dec. 93(12):1007-11. [Medline].

Murchison L, De Coppi P, Eaton S. Post-natal erythromycin exposure and risk of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2016 Dec. 32 (12):1147-1152. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Modarressi T. Question of an infectious etiology or contribution to the pathogenesis of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014 May. 58(5):546-8. [Medline].

McAteer JP, Ledbetter DJ, Goldin AB. Role of bottle feeding in the etiology of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Dec. 167(12):1143-9. [Medline].

Holder J, Zinn D, Samin A. Adult-Onset Idiopathic Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis Associated With Osteoglophonic Dysplasia and HIV: Case Report and Review of Literature. Ultrasound Q. 2017 Mar. 33 (1):77-81. [Medline].

Richards S, Farrant G, McCarthy G. Adult idiopathic hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. N Z Med J. 2016 Jul 1. 129 (1437):77-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Hernanz-Schulman M. Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Radiology. 2003 May. 227(2):319-31. [Medline]. [Full Text].

White MC, Langer JC, Don S, DeBaun MR. Sensitivity and cost minimization analysis of radiology versus olive palpation for the diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J Pediatr Surg. 1998 Jun. 33(6):913-7. [Medline].

Hulka F, Campbell TJ, Campbell JR, Harrison MW. Evolution in the recognition of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Pediatrics. 1997 Aug. 100(2):E9. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Chen EA, Luks FI, Gilchrist BF, Wesselhoeft CW Jr, DeLuca FG. Pyloric stenosis in the age of ultrasonography: fading skills, better patients?. J Pediatr Surg. 1996 Jun. 31(6):829-30. [Medline].

Altit G, Milot M. Images in clinical medicine. Peristaltic waves in pyloric stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 3. 369(14):e18. [Medline].

Mandell GA, Wolfson PJ, Adkins ES, et al. Cost-effective imaging approach to the nonbilious vomiting infant. Pediatrics. 1999 Jun. 103(6 Pt 1):1198-202. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Olson AD, Hernandez R, Hirschl RB. The role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pyloric stenosis: a decision analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 33(5). 1998 May:676-81. [Medline].

Hulka F, Campbell JR, Harrison MW, Campbell TJ. Cost-effectiveness in diagnosing infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J Pediatr Surg. 1997 Nov. 32(11):1604-8. [Medline].

Hernanz-Schulman M, Sells LL, Ambrosino MM, et al. Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in the infant without a palpable olive: accuracy of sonographic diagnosis. Radiology. 1994 Dec. 193(3):771-6. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Stunden RJ, LeQuesne GW, Little KE. The improved ultrasound diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Pediatr Radiol. 1986. 16(3):200-5. [Medline].

Mata-Gómez J, Guerrero-Domínguez R, García-Santigosa M, Ontanilla A. Ultrasound-guided paravertebral block for pyloromyotomy in 3 neonates with congenital hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2015 Jul-Aug. 65 (4):302-5. [Medline].

Niedzielski J, Kobielski A, Sokal J, Krakós M. Accuracy of sonographic criteria in the decision for surgical treatment in infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Arch Med Sci. 2011 Jun. 7(3):508-11. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Martinez-Leo B, Garcia-Cabello LM. Caterpillar Sign in Infantile Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 14. 377 (24):e33. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Costa Dias S, Swinson S, Torrão H, Gonçalves L, Kurochka S, Vaz CP, et al. Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: tips and tricks for ultrasound diagnosis. Insights Imaging. 2012 Jun. 3(3):247-50. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Blumer SL, Zucconi WB, Cohen HL, Scriven RJ, Lee TK. The vomiting neonate: a review of the ACR appropriateness criteria and ultrasound’s role in the workup of such patients. Ultrasound Q. 2004 Sep. 20(3):79-89. [Medline].

Rohrschneider WK, Mittnacht H, Darge K, Tröger J. Pyloric muscle in asymptomatic infants: sonographic evaluation and discrimination from idiopathic hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Pediatr Radiol. 1998 Jun. 28(6):429-34. [Medline].

Sorantin E, Fotter R, Schimpl G. Reversible portal venous gas in hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: detection by ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med. 1995 Sep. 14(9):699-701. [Medline].

Spevak MR, Ahmadjian JM, Kleinman PK, et al. Sonography of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: frequency and cause of nonuniform echogenicity of the thickened pyloric muscle. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992 Jan. 158(1):129-32. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Leaphart CL, Borland K, Kane TD, Hackam DJ. Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in newborns younger than 21 days: remodeling the path of surgical intervention. J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Jun. 43(6):998-1001. [Medline].

Sargent SK, Foote SL, Mooney DP, Shorter NA. The posterior approach to pyloric sonography. Pediatr Radiol. 2000 Apr. 30(4):256-7. [Medline].

Teele RL, Smith EH. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of idiopathic hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1977 May 19. 296(20):1149-50. [Medline].

Hernanz-Schulman M, Dinauer P, Ambrosino MM, Polk DB, Neblett WW 3rd. The antral nipple sign of pyloric mucosal prolapse: endoscopic correlation of a new sonographic observation in patients with pyloric stenosis. J Ultrasound Med. 1995 Apr. 14(4):283-7. [Medline].

Cohen HL, Blumer SL, Zucconi WB. The sonographic double-track sign: not pathognomonic for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis; can be seen in pylorospasm. J Ultrasound Med. 2004 May. 23(5):641-6. [Medline].

Cohen HL, Schechter S, Mestel AL, Eaton DH, Haller JO. Ultrasonic “double track” sign in hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J Ultrasound Med. 1987 Mar. 6(3):139-43. [Medline].

Forman HP, Leonidas JC, Kronfeld GD. A rational approach to the diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: do the results match the claims?. J Pediatr Surg. 1990 Feb. 25(2):262-6. [Medline].

Iqbal CW, Rivard DC, Mortellaro VE, Sharp SW, St Peter SD. Evaluation of ultrasonographic parameters in the diagnosis of pyloric stenosis relative to patient age and size. J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Aug. 47(8):1542-7. [Medline].

Susan J Back, MD Assistant Professor of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania

Susan J Back, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Women Radiologists, American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, Radiological Society of North America, Society for Pediatric Radiology