Irish Supreme Court Says Subway’s Bread, Well, Isn’t
Advertisement
Subway. Eat Fresh! This popular sandwich franchise has had one heck of a decade. From product placement skewing a bit too on-the-nose to a most unpleasant spokesperson who ended up in prison for some crimes that shall go unnamed here.
Now, the fast-food sandwich giant is under the scrutinizing eyes of the Irish Supreme Court, which just decided the chain’s bread isn’t, well, actually bread.
Advertisement
Advertisement
But if Subway’s bread isn’t legally bread, then what exactly is it?
“The bread supplied by Subway in its heated sandwiches has a sugar content of 10 percent of the weight of the flour included in the dough,” Justice Donal O’Donnell said in the judgment. The ruling came as a response to a tax dispute by an Irish Subway franchisee, Bookfinders Ltd. The franchise applied for a tax refund on the grounds the 12-inch hoagies were a “staple food” and that it shouldn’t pay value-added tax (VAT) on the rolls it uses in heated sandwiches.
Under Ireland’s VAT Act of 1972, ingredients like sugar and fat cannot “exceed 2 percent of the weight of flour in the dough.” So, how does Subway’s bread compare? Five judges in the Irish court system found the white and wholegrain rolls include 10 percent sugar, disqualifying them from both tax breaks and bread-bragging rights. From the Supreme Court ruling:
“Subway’s bread is, of course, bread,” a Subway representative told the BBC. “We have been baking fresh bread in our stores for more than three decades and our guests return each day for sandwiches made on bread that smells as good as it tastes.”
Regardless of what the bigwigs at Subway say about the bread’s taste-to-smell ratio, there’s no beating the Irish — especially when it comes to defining baked goods, apparently. So, where does that leave Subway and its luxurious sugary loaves?
They’ll now be considered “confectionary or fancy baked goods” — in the eyes of the Irish judicial, at least.
Is there a lesson to be learned from all of this? Bookfinders’ fancy baked goods will now be taxed at 13.5 percent, giving the franchisee a stark reminder that you can’t fight the tax system — and win anyway.
This isn’t the first legal fight waged against a fast food chain. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) also declared that Dairy Queen doesn’t serve ice cream, despite its 75-year history of doing just that. What’s next? An investigation into Lucky Charms’ flagrant lies surrounding the existence of cereal-sized Leprechauns, hearts, stars and horseshoes?
Unfortunately for Subway, this isn’t its first battle with the courts. Back in 2013, an Australian customer posted an image on social media of a “Footlong” sandwich that measured just 11 inches (28 centimeters). The post prompted a class-action lawsuit that didn’t come to an end until October 2017 when plaintiffs finally abandoned all efforts to pursue the case further.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Get the best of HowStuffWorks by email!
Keep up to date on: Latest Buzz · Stuff Shows & Podcasts · Tours · Weird & Wacky
Copyright © 2020 HowStuffWorks, a division of InfoSpace Holdings, LLC, a System1 Company
Privacy Choices
We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.
Irish Supreme Court Says Subway’s Bread, Well, Isn’t
Research & References of Irish Supreme Court Says Subway’s Bread, Well, Isn’t|A&C Accounting And Tax Services
Source
0 Comments