Pharmacologic Stress Testing
No Results
No Results
processing….
Exercise testing is a cardiovascular stress test using treadmill bicycle exercise with ECG and blood pressure monitoring. Pharmacologic stress testing, established after exercise testing, is a diagnostic procedure in which cardiovascular stress induced by pharmacologic agents is demonstrated in patients with decreased functional capacity or in patients who cannot exercise. [1] Pharmacologic stress testing is used in combination with imaging modalities such as radionuclide imaging and echocardiography.
Radionuclide uptake and ECG images are depicted below:
Adenosine, dipyridamole (Persantine), and dobutamine are the most widely available pharmacologic agents for stress testing. Regadenoson, an adenosine analog, has a longer half-life than adenosine, and therefore a bolus versus continuous administration.
Adenosine, dipyridamole, and regadenosine are cardiac vasodilators. They dilate coronary vessels, which causes increased blood velocity and flow rate in normal vessels and less of a response in stenotic vessels. This difference in response leads to a steal of flow, and perfusion defects appear in cardiac nuclear scans or as ST-segment changes.
Dobutamine is a cardiac inotrope and chronotrope. The heart responds to dobutamine similarly to the way it responds to exercise.
Adenosine is a naturally occurring substance found throughout the body in various tissues. It functions to regulate blood flow in many vascular beds, including the myocardium. The mechanisms by which adenosine is produced intracellularly are the S -adenosyl homocysteine and the adenosine triphosphate pathways; the latter plays a role during ischemia.
Once transported across cell membranes, adenosine interacts and activates the A1 and A2 cell surface receptors. In the vascular smooth muscles, adenosine primarily acts by activation of the A2 receptor, which stimulates adenylate cyclase, leading to an increase in cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production. Increased cAMP levels inhibit calcium uptake by the sarcolemma, causing smooth muscle relaxation and vasodilation. Activation of the vascular A1 receptor also occurs, which stimulates guanylate cyclase, inducing cyclic guanosine monophosphate production, leading to vasodilation.
This direct coronary artery vasodilation induced by adenosine is attenuated in diseased coronary arteries, which have a reduced coronary flow reserve and cannot further dilate in response to adenosine. This is not the case in healthy or less-diseased coronary arteries in the same patient, which produces relative flow heterogeneity throughout the coronary arteries, resulting in relatively more coronary blood flow in the healthy or less-diseased coronary arteries compared with the more-diseased coronary artery. In most cases, coronary blood flow in the diseased coronary arteries does not decrease.
In cases of severe vessel stenosis or total occlusions with compensatory collateral circulation, a decrease in coronary blood flow may occur in the diseased coronary artery, thus inducing ischemia via a coronary steal phenomenon. This regional flow abnormality also induces a perfusion defect during radionuclide imaging.
Dipyridamole is an indirect coronary vasodilator that works by increasing intravascular adenosine levels. This occurs by the inhibition of intracellular reuptake and deamination of adenosine. However, the increase in coronary blood flow induced by dipyridamole is less predictable than that of adenosine.
In one comparative study of dipyridamole and adenosine, 66% of patients (10 of 15) receiving dipyridamole versus 80% of patients (12 of 15) receiving adenosine had a maximal hyperemic response. However, this difference may not be apparent clinically. The mechanism of inducing a perfusion abnormality is similar to that of adenosine (see adenosine discussion above) except true coronary steal occurs more frequently.
Dobutamine is a synthetic catecholamine, which directly stimulates both beta-1 and beta-2 receptors. A dose-related increase in heart rate, blood pressure, and myocardial contractility occurs.
As with physical exertion, dobutamine increases regional myocardial blood flow based on physiological principles of coronary flow reserve. A similar dose-related increase in subepicardial and subendocardial blood flow occurs within vascular beds supplied by significantly stenosed arteries, with most of the increase occurring within the subepicardium rather than the subendocardium. Thus, perfusion abnormalities are induced by the development of regional myocardial ischemia.
Hyperemic impedance echocardiography (HIE) may have the potential to detect inducible myocardial ischemia for patients in whom exercise or pharmacologic stress testing is contraindicated or not tolerated. In a pilot study involving 20 consecutive outpatients with suspected stable coronary artery disease who underwent clinically indicated dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and then HIE, HIE was 86% sensitive and 67% specific in identifying inducible myocardial ischemia as evaluated by regional wall motion abnormalities, as well as 83% sensitive for detecting significant CAD (≥50% diameter stenosis) on coronary angiography. [2]
Regadenoson is a pharmacologic stress agent approved by the FDA in 2008 as an additional agent for use in stress testing for patients unable to perform the standard exercise stress test. [3, 4]
Regadenoson produces maximal hyperemia quickly and maintains it for an optimal duration that is practical for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging. Regadenoson’s simple rapid bolus administration and short duration of hyperemic effect point to an advantage of enhanced control for the clinician.
Regadenoson is an agonist with low affinity (Ki ≈ 1.3 μM) for the A2A adenosine receptor, and at least a 10-fold lower affinity for the A1 adenosine receptor (Ki > 16.5 μM). In addition, it has relatively weak affinity for the A2B and A3 adenosine receptors.
Coronary vasodilation and an increase in coronary blood flow (CBF) results from activation of the A2A adenosine receptor by regadenoson.
Dobutamine stress echocardiography is frequently used to assess myocardial viability; however, the inotropic response to adrenergic stimulation may be reduced in patients receiving a beta-blocker. In addition, dobutamine may sometimes induce ischemia in patients with a critical coronary stenosis, which might mask hibernation by preventing the improvement in wall motion.
Another approach is the use of an imidazole phosphodiesterase inhibitor such as enoximone or milrinone, drugs that are relatively unaffected by concurrent use of a beta-blocker and are used for inotropic support in congestive heart failure.
Enoximone stress echocardiography as an additional stress testing modality was evaluated in one study of 45 patients with chronic coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction who underwent echocardiography with both dobutamine and enoximone.
Both increased heart rate, but enoximone did not cause a significant change in systolic blood pressure. The positive predictive value and specificity were similar between enoximone and dobutamine. Concordant results were seen in 85% of affected segments, but enoximone had a higher sensitivity (88% vs 79% for dobutamine) and negative predictive value (90% vs 84%) in predicting functional recovery after revascularization.
At this time, enoximone is not approved for use in the United States; however, the pharmacology of milrinone is very similar, and this agent could be considered for use as a pharmacologic stress agent in selected patients on beta-blockers. Further investigations will be required to validate this approach.
Arm exercise may have the potential to be an effective and low-cost alternative to pharmacologic stress testing. [5] In a 6-year study (1997-2002) with 12 years of follow-up in 446 veterans aged 64 years with lower-extremity disabilities, Martin et al used ergometer stress tests to evaluate exercise variables in predicting long-term all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization. None of the exercise variables predicted myocardial infarction, but factors predictive of 12-year all-cause death included arm exercise capacity, heart rate recovery, and delta heart rate, whereas factors predictive of coronary revascularization included stress-induced ST-segment deviations, limiting angina, and an abnormal perfusion imaging finding. [5]
The American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) appropriateness utilization criteria (AUC) provide guidelines for appropriate testing. Pharmacologic stress testing is generally instituted when contraindications to routine exercise stress exist or when the patient is unable to exercise because of debilitating conditions in various forms. These include the following general indications:
Elderly patients with decreased functional capacity and possible CAD
Patients with chronic debilitation and possible CAD
Younger patients with functional impairment due to injury, arthritis, orthopedic problems, peripheral neuropathy, myopathies, or peripheral vascular disease, in which a maximal heart rate is not easily achieved with routine exercise stress testing, usually because of an early onset of fatigue due to musculoskeletal, neurologic, or vascular problems rather than cardiac ischemia
Other cases, including patients taking beta-blockers or other negative chronotropic agents that would inhibit the ability to achieve an adequate heart response to exercise
Indications for specific pharmacologic agents are as follows:
Any physical limitation that prevents a patient from exercising maximally is an indication for vasodilator stress testing.
Patients taking beta-blockers or other negative chronotropic agents that would inhibit the ability to achieve an adequate heart rate response to exercise are also appropriate candidates for vasodilator stress.
Patients with left bundle branch block or ventricular pacemaker (particularly those with severely diseased AV nodes or status post-AV node ablation who are unable to override their ventricular pacing rate) should undergo pharmacologic vasodilator stress because exercise stress often produces a false-positive perfusion defect in the interventricular septum.
These defects are probably related to decreased septal contractility, which is accompanied by an autoregulated fall in coronary blood flow to the interventricular septum. Exercise stress or any other cause of tachycardia tends to enhance this heterogeneous perfusion by increasing the flow proportionately more in the normally contracting myocardium, resulting in a falsely underperfused interventricular septum on perfusion imaging. Vasodilator stress has been shown to overcome this coronary blood flow autoregulation, resulting in a more homogeneous perfusion pattern.
Any physical limitation that prevents a patient from exercising maximally is an indication for vasodilator stress.
Patients taking beta-blockers or other negative chronotropic agents that would inhibit the ability to achieve an adequate heart rate response to exercise are also appropriate candidates for vasodilator stress.
Patients with left bundle branch block or a ventricular pacemaker (particularly those with severely diseased AV nodes or status post-AV node ablation who are unable to override their ventricular pacing rate) should undergo vasodilator stress, because exercise stress often produces a false-positive perfusion defect in the interventricular septum. These defects are probably related to decreased septal contractility, which is accompanied by an autoregulated decrease in coronary blood flow to the interventricular septum. Exercise stress or any other cause of tachycardia tends to enhance this heterogeneous perfusion by increasing the flow proportionately more in the normally contracting myocardium, resulting in a falsely underperfused interventricular septum with perfusion imaging. Vasodilator stress has been shown to overcome this coronary blood flow autoregulation, resulting in a more homogeneous perfusion pattern.
Note that a case of ST-elevation myocardial infarction has been reported in a patient with Wellens syndrome following dypyridamole stress testing. [6]
Consider dobutamine as a second-line pharmacologic stressor to be used in patients who cannot perform exercise stress and have a contraindication to vasodilator stress.
Regadenoson injection is indicated for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in patients unable to undergo adequate exercise stress testing due to body habitus or other comorbidities as outlined in contraindications for exercise stress testing in Medscape Drugs & Diseases article Treadmill Stress Testing.
Current AUC guidelines do not recommend routine testing within 2 years for patients who have undergone coronary revascularization procedures. However, one study has shown that 12% of these patients who visit their physician at least 3 months after the procedure undergo stress echocardiography testing within 30 days of the visit. The study shows discretionary stress testing is performed more frequently by physicians who bill for technical and professional fees compared to physicians who do not bill for these services, possibly as a way to recoup upfront costs for imaging equipment. [3]
Specific pharmacologic agents have specific contraindications, as follows:
Absolute contraindications include the following:
Patients with active bronchospasm or patients being treated for reactive airway disease should not be administered adenosine because this can lead to prolonged bronchospasm, which can be difficult to treat or can remain refractory.
Patients with more than first-degree heart block (without a ventricular-demand pacemaker) should not undergo adenosine infusion because this may lead to worsening of the heart block. While this is usually transient, due to the extremely short half-life of adenosine (approximately 6 s), cases of prolonged heart block (and asystole) have been reported.
Patients with an SBP less than 90 mm Hg should not undergo adenosine stress testing because of the potential for further lowering of the blood pressure.
Patients using dipyridamole or methylxanthines (eg, caffeine and aminophylline) should not undergo an adenosine stress test because these substances act as competitive inhibitors of adenosine at the receptor level, potentially decreasing or completely attenuating the vasodilatory effect of adenosine. In general, patients should refrain from ingesting caffeine for at least 24 hours prior to adenosine administration. Patients should avoid decaffeinated products, which typically contain some caffeine, as opposed to caffeine-free products, which do not.
Relative contraindications include the following:
Patients with a remote history of reactive airway disease (COPD/asthma) that has been quiescent for a long time (approximately 1 y) may be candidates for adenosine. However, if a question exists concerning the status of the patients’ airway disease, a dobutamine stress test may be the safer choice.
Patients with a history of sick sinus syndrome (without a ventricular-demand pacemaker) should undergo adenosine stress testing with caution. These patients are prone to significant bradycardia with adenosine; therefore, use caution if they are to undergo adenosine stress. Similarly, those patients with severe bradycardia (heart rate of 40 bpm) should undergo adenosine stress with caution.
Absolute contraindications include the following:
Patients with active bronchospasm or patients being treated for reactive airway disease should not be administered dipyridamole because this can lead to prolonged bronchospasm, which can be difficult to treat or can remain refractory.
Patients with more than first-degree heart block (without a ventricular demand pacemaker) should not undergo dipyridamole infusion because this may lead to worsening of the heart block.
Patients with an SBP of less than 90 mm Hg should not undergo dipyridamole stress testing because of the potential for further lowering of the blood pressure.
Patients using methylxanthines (eg, caffeine, aminophylline) should not undergo dipyridamole stress testing because these substances act as competitive inhibitors of dipyridamole at the receptor level, potentially decreasing or completely attenuating the vasodilatory effect of dipyridamole. In general, patients should refrain from ingesting caffeine for at least 24 hours prior to dipyridamole administration. Patients should avoid decaffeinated products, which typically contain some caffeine, as opposed to caffeine-free products, which do not.
Relative contraindications include the following:
Patients with a remote history of reactive airway disease (COPD/asthma) that has been quiescent for a long time (approximately 1 y) may be candidates for dipyridamole. However, if a question exists concerning the status of the patients’ airway disease, dobutamine stress testing may be the safer choice.
Patients with a history of sick sinus syndrome (without a ventricular demand pacemaker) should undergo dipyridamole stress testing with caution. These patients are prone to significant bradycardia with dipyridamole; therefore, use caution if they are to undergo dipyridamole stress. Similarly, those patients with severe bradycardia (heart rate 40 bpm) should undergo dipyridamole stress with caution.
Patients with recent (1 wk) myocardial infarction; unstable angina; significant aortic stenosis or obstructive cardiomyopathy; atrial tachyarrhythmias with uncontrolled ventricular response; history of ventricular tachycardia, uncontrolled hypertension, or thoracic aortic aneurysm; or left bundle branch block should not undergo dobutamine stress testing.
Regadenoson should not be administered to patients with second-degree atrioventricular block or sinus node dysfunction, unless these patients have a functioning artificial pacemaker.
Due to the increased risk for a fatal myocardial infarction, the FDA issued a warning in November 2013 that the imaging agents regadenoson (Lexiscan) and adenosine (Adenoscan) should not be used for cardiac nuclear stress tests in patients with signs or symptoms of unstable angina or cardiovascular instability. [7, 8]
The FDA has received reports of 26 myocardial infarctions and 29 deaths after the administration of regadenoson since its approval in 2008. Six myocardial infarctions and 27 deaths have been reported with adenosine. [7, 8]
Review the patient’s medication and caffeine intake.
Theophylline can reduce ischemic changes on the ECG with vasodilator stress testing.
Caffeine has been reported to reduce ischemic changes on ECG with vasodilator stress testing. However, one study demonstrated that one cup of coffee, one hour prior to stress testing did not attenuate the results of adenosine nuclear imaging. [9]
Calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers, and nitrates can also alter perfusion defects on pharmacologic stress tests and therefore ideally should be withheld for 24 hours prior to pharmacologic stress testing.
Dipyridamole and adenosine can lead to bronchospasm; they are generally avoided in patients with severe reactive airway disease or active wheezing. Dobutamine is safe to use in these patients.
Instruct patients with diabetes regarding insulin requirements.
The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Clinical Competence Statement on Stress Testing emphasizes the importance of knowledge of possible complications and rates of complications for particular agents for patients and those supervising stress tests. The following guidelines are of particular importance:
Avoid contraindications.
Do not exceed standard dosages.
Perform tests only after informed consent has been obtained.
Ensure an attending physician is present.
Retain outpatients for 60 minutes after testing.
Ensure indications for testing are met.
Stress testing does not successfully identify all high-risk patients.
The table below depicts findings and results for stress testing.
Table 1. Findings and Likely Associated Results (Open Table in a new window)
Results
Rest
Stress
Conclusion
Findings
Normal
Normal
Blood flow to coronary artery is likely normal
Findings
Normal
Reversible perfusion defect
Artery blockage may be present
Findings
Abnormal
Abnormal
Heart has had prior injury, eg, previous heart attack
Potential findings are illustrated in the images below:
Blankstein R, Cannon C, Udelson J. Update on pharmacological cardiac stress testing: efficacy, risk stratification and patient selection. Am J Med. 2014 Nov. 127(11):e16-7. [Medline].
Patel JJ, Gupta A, Nanda NC. Comparison of hyperemic impedance echocardiography with dobutamine stress echocardiography to detect inducible myocardial ischemia: a pilot study. Echocardiography. 2016 Mar. 33(3):416-20. [Medline].
Shah BR, Cowper PA, O’Brien SM, et al. Association between physician billing and cardiac stress testing patterns following coronary revascularization. JAMA. 2011 Nov 9. 306(18):1993-2000. [Medline].
Pazhenkottil AP, Nkoulou RN, Ghadri JR, et al. Prognostic value of cardiac hybrid imaging integrating single-photon emission computed tomography with coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur Heart J. 2011 Jun. 32(12):1465-71. [Medline].
Martin WH 3rd, Xian H, Wagner D, Chandiramani P, Bainter E, Ilias-Khan N. Arm exercise as an alternative to pharmacologic stress testing: arm exercise stress testing and outcome. Am Heart J. 2014 Feb. 167(2):169-77. [Medline].
Patel K, Alattar F, Koneru J, Shamoon F. ST-elevation myocardial infarction after pharmacologic persantine stress test in a patient with Wellens’ syndrome. Case Rep Emerg Med. 2014. 2014:530451. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Lowes R. FDA issues warning on regadenoson, adenosine. Medscape Medical News from WebMD. November 20, 2013. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/814727. Accessed: December 1, 2013.
US Food & Drug Administration. FDA warns of rare but serious risk of heart attack and death with cardiac nuclear stress test drugs Lexiscan (regadenoson) and Adenoscan (adenosine). November 20, 2013. Available at http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm375654.htm. Accessed: December 1, 2013.
Zoghbi GJ, Htay T, Aqel R, Blackmon L, Heo J, Iskandrian AE. Effect of caffeine on ischemia detection by adenosine single-photon emission computed tomography perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Jun 6. 47(11):2296-302. [Medline].
Korosoglou G, Gitsioudis G, Voss A, et al. Strain-encoded cardiac magnetic resonance during high-dose dobutamine stress testing for the estimation of cardiac outcomes comparison to clinical parameters and conventional wall motion readings. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Sep 6. 58(11):1140-9. [Medline].
Abe S, Takeishi Y, Chiba J, Ikeda K, Tomoike H. Comparison of adenosine and treadmill exercise thallium-201 stress tests for the detection of coronary artery disease. Jpn Circ J. 1993 Dec. 57(12):1111-9. [Medline].
Beller GA. New directions in myocardial perfusion imaging. Clin Cardiol. 1993 Feb. 16(2):86-94. [Medline].
Beller GA. Radionuclide perfusion imaging techniques for evaluation of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Adv Intern Med. 1997. 42:139-201. [Medline].
Botvinick EH. Current methods of pharmacologic stress testing and the potential advantages of new agents. J Nucl Med Technol. 2009 Mar. 37(1):14-25. [Medline].
Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction–summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Oct 2. 40(7):1366-74. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Cerqueira MD, Nguyen P, Staehr P, Underwood SR, Iskandrian AE. Effects of age, gender, obesity, and diabetes on the efficacy and safety of the selective A2A agonist regadenoson versus adenosine in myocardial perfusion imaging integrated ADVANCE-MPI trial results. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008 May. 1(3):307-16. [Medline].
Ellstead MH. Stress Testing: Principles and Practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: FA Davis; 1995.
Fletcher GF, Flipse TR, Kligfield P, Malouf JR. Current status of ECG stress testing. Curr Probl Cardiol. 1998 Jul. 23(7):353-423. [Medline].
Goraya TY, Jacobsen SJ, Pellikka PA, et al. Prognostic value of treadmill exercise testing in elderly persons. Ann Intern Med. 2000 Jun 6. 132(11):862-70. [Medline].
Guyton AC, Hall JE. Textbook of Medical Physiology. 9th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1995.
Mansoor MR, Heller GV. Recent developments in the prognostic use of myocardial perfusion imaging. Curr Opin Cardiol. 1997 Nov. 12(6):571-80. [Medline].
Ruf J, Paganelli F, Bonello L, et al. Spare adenosine A2a receptors are associated with positive exercise stress test in coronary artery disease. Mol Med. 2016 Jul 19. 22:[Medline].
Puente-Maestu L, Palange P, Casaburi R, et al. Use of exercise testing in the evaluation of interventional efficacy: an official ERS statement. Eur Respir J. 2016 Feb. 47(2):429-60. [Medline].
Sampaio F, Lamata P, Bettencourt N, et al. Assessment of cardiovascular physiology using dobutamine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance reveals impaired contractile reserve in patients with cirrhotic cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015 Jul 18. 17:61. [Medline].
Hunter CR, Hill J, Ziadi MC, Beanlands RS, deKemp RA. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of (82)Rb at rest and during peak pharmacological stress in patients referred for myocardial perfusion imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Jun. 42(7):1032-42. [Medline].
Saab R, Hage FG. Vasodilator stress agents for myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017 Apr. 24(2):434-8. [Medline].
Greulich S, Kaesemann P, Seitz A, et al. Effects of caffeine on the detection of ischemia in patients undergoing adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017 Dec 18. 19(1):103. [Medline].
Gilewski W, Blazejewski J, Karasek D, et al. Are changes in heart rate, observed during dobutamine stress echocardiography, associated with a response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with severe heart failure? Results of a multicentre ViaCRT study. Kardiol Pol. 2018. 76(3):611-7. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Pagnanelli RA, Camposano HL. Pharmacologic stress testing with myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med Technol. 2017 Dec. 45(4):249-52. [Medline].
Results
Rest
Stress
Conclusion
Findings
Normal
Normal
Blood flow to coronary artery is likely normal
Findings
Normal
Reversible perfusion defect
Artery blockage may be present
Findings
Abnormal
Abnormal
Heart has had prior injury, eg, previous heart attack
David Akinpelu, MD, FACP Emergency Medicine Attending Physician, Riverside Tappahannock Hospital/Riverside Shore Memorial Hospital, Riverside Medical Group
David Akinpelu, MD, FACP is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, American Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference
Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.
Ronald J Oudiz, MD, FACP, FACC, FCCP Professor of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine; Director, Liu Center for Pulmonary Hypertension, Division of Cardiology, LA Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
Ronald J Oudiz, MD, FACP, FACC, FCCP is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Cardiology, American College of Chest Physicians, American Thoracic Society, American College of Physicians, American Heart Association
Disclosure: Serve(d) as a speaker or a member of a speakers bureau for: Actelion, Bayer, Gilead, Lung Biotechnology, United Therapeutics<br/>Received research grant from: Actelion, Bayer, Gilead, Ikaria, Lung Biotechnology, Pfizer, Reata, United Therapeutics<br/>Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: Actelion, Bayer, Gilead, Lung Biotechnology, Medtronic, Reata, United Therapeutics.
Eric H Yang, MD Associate Professor of Medicine, Director of Cardiac Catherization Laboratory and Interventional Cardiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona
Eric H Yang, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Justin D Pearlman, MD, ME, PhD, FACC, MA Chief, Division of Cardiology, Director of Cardiology Consultative Service, Director of Cardiology Clinic Service, Director of Cardiology Non-Invasive Laboratory, Chair of Institutional Review Board, University of California, Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine
Justin D Pearlman, MD, ME, PhD, FACC, MA is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Cardiology, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, American College of Physicians, American Federation for Medical Research, Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Javier M Gonzalez, MD Consulting Staff, Department of Cardiology, Citrus Cardiology Consultants
Javier M Gonzalez, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Cardiology and American Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Pharmacologic Stress Testing
Research & References of Pharmacologic Stress Testing|A&C Accounting And Tax Services
Source
0 Comments