Echocardiography
No Results
No Results
processing….
The use of echocardiography as an imaging modality has increased substantially over the past decade. Cardiologists perform most echocardiography studies, with internists being the next most common providers of these studies (15% of all Medicare charges submitted for the procedure). [1] The objective of this article is to provide clinicians with a brief review of basic principles and instrumentation of echocardiography.
Neither bone nor air is a good transmission medium for ultrasound waves; accordingly, specific windows (eg, apical, parasternal, subcostal, and suprasternal) are used to image the heart.
Two-dimensional (2-D) echocardiography provides real-time imaging of heart structures throughout the cardiac cycle; more recently, 3-dimensional (3-D) echocardiography has been developed. Doppler echocardiography provides information on blood movement inside cardiac structures and on hemodynamics.
Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) provides information about movement of cardiac structures. The relation between the dynamics of cardiac structures and the hemodynamics of the blood inside these structures provides information about cardiac diastolic and systolic function. Echocardiography is continuously evolving and constantly being augmented by newer modalities, such as tissue harmonics, speckle tracking, tissue Doppler strain, and tissue characterization.
Dedicated training for competent performance and interpretation of echocardiography is essential. The American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) have recommended a set of minimum knowledge and training requirements for the performance and interpretation of echocardiography, including a minimum number of 150 performed and 300 interpreted examinations for level 2 competency in interpreting echocardiography. [2] Similar guidelines have been developed in Canada. [3]
Humans can hear sound waves with frequencies ranging from 20 to 20,000 cycles per second—that is, from 20 Hertz (Hz) to 20 kHz. Frequencies higher than 20 kHz are referred to as ultrasound. Diagnostic medical ultrasonography usually uses transducers with frequencies of 1-20 MHz. Ultrasound waves are described in terms of the following features:
Frequency (Hz)
Wavelength (mm)
Amplitude, or loudness (decibels [dB])
Velocity of propagation (m/sec) – This varies according to the type of tissue medium carrying the wave (it is approximately 1540 m/sec in blood)
These phenomena are the basis for many of the clinical applications and calculations of echocardiography.
Interaction of ultrasound waves with tissue results in reflection, scattering, refraction, and attenuation of the waves. 2-D echocardiographic imaging is based on reflection of transmitted ultrasound waves. Doppler analysis is based on the scattering of ultrasound waves from moving blood cells, with a resulting change in the frequency of the waves received at the transducer. Attenuation limits the depth of ultrasound penetration. Refraction, a change in the direction of the ultrasound wave, results in imaging artifacts.
Because wavelength (λ) times frequency (ƒ) equals the propagation velocity (с), or λ × ƒ = с, and the propagation velocity in the heart is 1540 m/sec, the wavelength for any transducer frequency can be calculated as follows:
λ (mm) = 1.54/ƒ (MHz)
Wavelength has clinical importance, in that image resolution cannot be greater than 1-2 wavelengths. That is to say, the higher the frequency, the shorter the wavelength and the better the image resolution.
The depth to which ultrasound waves penetrate the body is directly related to wavelength (ie, shorter wavelengths penetrate a shorter distance). [4] The depth of penetration for adequate imaging tends to be limited to about 200 wavelengths. Thus, an obvious tradeoff exists between image resolution and depth of penetration. Thus, a 1-MHz transducer has a penetration depth of 30 cm and resolution of 1.5 mm, whereas a 5-MHz transducer has a lesser penetration depth, only 6 cm, but a higher resolution, approximately 0.3 mm.
2-D imaging depends on reflection of ultrasound waves. These waves are reflected at tissue boundaries and interfaces, with the quantity dependent on the relative change in acoustic impedance (ie, density) between the 2 tissues. Optimal return of reflected ultrasound waves occurs at a perpendicular angle (90°).
Doppler flow imaging depends on the scattering phenomenon, and its optimal flow angle is the opposite of that for 2-D imaging (ie, parallel to the flow of interest, rather than perpendicular). The Doppler effect may be simply stated as follows: A person moving toward a sound source will hear a tone with higher frequency than the emitted wave frequency, whereas a person moving away from the source of sound will hear the tone with a lower frequency than the emitted wave frequency.
Additional common terms and concepts employed in echocardiography include the following:
Duty factor – The fraction of time during which a transducer is sending an ultrasound impulse
Intensity – Power divided by area, expressed as watts (W)/cm2
Attenuation – Reduction in intensity with travel, resulting from the effects of absorption plus those of scattering; in tissues, attenuation can be calculated by means of the following equation: 0.5 dB/cm-MHz × depth (cm) × transducer frequency (MHz)
Round-trip travel of an ultrasound beam in tissue – 13 μsec/cm
Variables affecting pulse repetition frequency (PRF) – PRF is limited by the following equation: Depth (cm) × number of foci × lines/frame × frames/sec < 77,000
The ACC, the AHA, and the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) have published detailed practice guidelines for the clinical application of echocardiography. [5] More recently, these and other bodies have collaborated to establish appropriate use criteria for echocardiography. [6]
Briefly, indications of echocardiography may be divided into structural imaging and hemodynamic imaging. Indications for structural imaging include the following:
Structural imaging of the pericardium (eg, to exclude pericardial effusion)
Structural imaging of the left or right ventricle and their cavities (eg, to evaluate ventricular hypertrophy, dilatation, or wall motion abnormality; to visualize thrombi)
Structural imaging of the valves (eg, mitral stenosis, aortic stenosis, mitral valve prolapse; see the first image below)
Structural imaging of the great vessels (eg, aortic dissection)
Structural imaging of atria and septa between cardiac chambers (eg, congenital heart disease, traumatic heart disease; see the second image below)
Indications for hemodynamic imaging through Doppler techniques include the following:
Imaging of blood flow through heart valves (eg, valvular stenosis and regurgitation; see the image below)
Imaging of blood flow through the cardiac chambers (eg, cardiac output calculation, assessment of diastolic and systolic function of the heart)
Tissue Doppler imaging of heart structures – This, compared with Doppler imaging of blood flow through these structures, provides valuable information about the dynamics of heart function; for example, in diastolic dysfunction, an increased ratio of early transmitral Doppler blood flow to early mitral annulus tissue Doppler indicates that a high intra-atrial pressure is an important driving force
Echocardiography has no contraindications. It should be kept in mind, however, that this modality may yield only limited information in patients at the extremes of adult body weight, because a thick chest wall (in markedly obese patients) or overcrowded ribs (in severely underweight patients) may limit the penetration of ultrasound waves.
The following considerations should be kept in mind in the performance of echocardiography:
Transducer selection – Although each transducer has a stated frequency, with each burst it actually emits a range of different ultrasound wave frequencies, and this range is called its frequency bandwidth; a wider emitted bandwidth yields better resolution of distant structures and also allows a short pulse, thus avoiding overlap between the reflected ultrasound signals; a smaller transducer “footprint” or aperture size is an advantage, in that it facilitates use in narrow intercostal spaces
Depth adjustment – To improve resolution, depth should be decreased to the minimum needed to visualize the structure of interest; in an average adult, a depth of 16 cm is usually adequate for the apical view, and a depth of 12 cm suffices for the parasternal view
Transducer frequency – This should adjusted to the maximum that permits adequate depth penetration [7]
Time gain compensation (TGC) – This function should be set in the midrange, with lower gain in the near field and higher setting in the far field to compensate for attenuation of the beam at higher depths [7]
Tissue harmonics – Harmonic imaging can result in a false appearance of a thickened valve leaflet; if there is doubt about the actual valve thickness, the tissue harmonics feature should be turned off and a reassessment made
Transmit gain/output – This should be adjusted to optimize image brightness; if emitted energy is too low, everything appears black, but if it is too high, a whiteout results; it should initially be set to high and then adjusted downward [7]
Dynamic range/compress function – If image is quality is poor, this function should be decreased to produce better contrast images; on the other hand, increasing the setting of this function softens the images [7]
Focus function – This is used to clarify a structure of specific interest (eg, an apical thrombus in the left ventricle); when the beam is focused, it is adjusted to be narrowest at the area of interest, resulting in better resolution
Electrocardiography (ECG) lead placement – Because digital echocardiography stores few cycles for each view, ectopic beats can result in a false impression about wall motion or ventricular function; for example, a postectopic beat compensatory period may falsely increase the ejection fraction or Doppler transvalvular gradient; in general, store beats without ectopic activity, and in atrial fibrillation, record at least 7-10 beats
Contrast agents – These should be considered for improving endocardial delineation
Timing – Images should be obtained at end-expiration, when the heart is closer to the transducer
A good continuous Doppler signal should yield a Doppler spectral signal that has a smooth contour with well-defined edge, onset, and end of flow; the display is “filled in” because lower-velocity signals throughout the pathway of the beam are captured by the continuous beam; the audible signal is tonal and smooth
In continuous-wave Doppler, although the maximum frequency shift depends on the intercept angle between the Doppler beam and the flow of interest, the amplitude (grayscale intensity) and shape of spectral display are less dependent on the intercept angle; thus, a good Doppler signal may be recorded at a nonparallel intercept angle, resulting in underestimation of flow velocity [4] ; accordingly, the flow of interest should be examined from multiple windows to discover the highest value, which is then assumed to represent the parallel flow
In Doppler measurement, the wall filter should be set to low to avoid overestimation of the low velocities
In Doppler imaging, the gate width should be adjusted according to the flow of interest: 1-2 mm for mitral left ventricular outflow, 3-4 mm for pulmonary venous flow, and 5-10 mm for TDI
In TDI, a sample size of 6-8 mm should be used, the Doppler scale should be decreased (velocities here are much lower than blood flow velocities), power and gain should be decreased (the amplitude are strong enough), the filter should be decreased (otherwise the lower velocities of tissue will be filtered out), and the reject and compress functions should be increased
Digital echocardiography is now state-of-the-art; to enable interoperability between laboratories, all echocardiography machines should use Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) standards for processing and storing information
Pearlman AS, Ryan T, Picard MH, Douglas PS. Evolving trends in the use of echocardiography: a study of Medicare beneficiaries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jun 12. 49(23):2283-91. [Medline].
Ryan T, Armstrong WF, Khandheria BK. Task force 4: training in echocardiography endorsed by the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jan 22. 51(3):361-7. [Medline].
Burwash IG, Basmadjian A, Bewick D, Choy JB, Cujec B, Jassal DS, et al. 2010 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Society of Echocardiography Guidelines for Training and Maintenance of Competency in Adult Echocardiography. Can J Cardiol. 2011 Jul 26. [Medline].
Otto C. Textbook of clinical echocardiography. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 2000.
Cheitlin MD, Armstrong WF, Aurigemma GP, Beller GA, Bierman FZ, Davis JL. ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 Guideline Update for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASE Committee to Update the 1997 Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography). J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003 Oct. 16(10):1091-110. [Medline].
Douglas PS, Garcia MJ, Haines DE, Lai WW, Manning WJ, Patel AR, et al. ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echocardiography, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, a… J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Mar 1. 57(9):1126-66. [Medline].
Nash P, Lin S, Armstrong G. Transthoracic echocardiography. Griffin B, Topol EJ. Manual of cardiovascular medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004. 780-815.
Feigenbaum H. Echocardiography. Braunwald E. Heart Disease: a Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1997. 53-97.
Pellerin D, Sharma R, Elliott P, Veyrat C. Tissue Doppler, strain, and strain rate echocardiography for the assessment of left and right systolic ventricular function. Heart. 2003 Nov. 89 Suppl 3:iii9-17. [Medline].
Marwick TH. Measurement of strain and strain rate by echocardiography: ready for prime time?. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Apr 4. 47(7):1313-27. [Medline].
Kirkpatrick JN, Vannan MA, Narula J, Lang RM. Echocardiography in heart failure: applications, utility, and new horizons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jul 31. 50(5):381-96. [Medline].
Weyman AE. The year in echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Apr 28. 53(17):1558-67. [Medline].
Thomas JD, Adams DB, Devries S, Ehler D, Greenberg N, Garcia M, et al. Guidelines and recommendations for digital echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005 Mar. 18(3):287-97. [Medline].
Thomas JD. The DICOM Image Formatting Standard: what it means for echocardiographers. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1995 May-Jun. 8(3):319-27. [Medline].
Mulvagh SL, Rakowski H, Vannan MA, Abdelmoneim SS, Becher H, Bierig SM. American Society of Echocardiography Consensus Statement on the Clinical Applications of Ultrasonic Contrast Agents in Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008 Nov. 21(11):1179-201; quiz 1281. [Medline].
Ishak A Mansi, MD, FACP Staff Internist, VA North Texas Health Care; Professor in Department of Medicine and Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Outcomes and Health Services Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Southwestern Medical School
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Ahmad M Slim, MD, FACP, FACC Assistant Professor of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, F Edward Hebert School of Medicine; Director, Cardiovascular Research Department, Director, Preventive Cardiology Clinic, Director, Advanced Cardiac Imaging, Brooke Army Medical Center
Ahmad M Slim, MD, FACP, FACC is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Cardiology, American College of Physicians, American Heart Association, American Medical Association, American Medical Student Association/Foundation
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Richard A Lange, MD, MBA President, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Dean, Paul L Foster School of Medicine
Richard A Lange, MD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, Association of Subspecialty Professors
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Mary L Windle, PharmD Adjunct Associate Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Acknowledgments
The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of Brooke Army Medical Center, the US Army Medical Department, the US Army Office of the Surgeon General, the Department of the Army, Department of Defense, or the US Government.
Echocardiography
Research & References of Echocardiography|A&C Accounting And Tax Services
Source
0 Comments