Pancreatic Pseudocysts
No Results
No Results
processing….
Pancreatic pseudocysts (see the image below) are best defined as localized fluid collections that are rich in amylase and other pancreatic enzymes, that have a nonepithelialized wall consisting of fibrous and granulation tissue, and that usually appear several weeks after the onset of pancreatitis. They are to be distinguished from acute fluid collections, organized necrosis, and abscesses.
No specific set of symptoms is pathognomonic of pseudocysts; however, the following are suggestive:
Persistent abdominal pain, anorexia, or abdominal mass after pancreatitis
Jaundice or sepsis from an infected pseudocyst (rare)
Physical examination findings are of limited sensitivity but may include the following:
Tender abdomen
Palpable mass in the abdomen
Peritoneal signs suggesting rupture of the cyst or infection
Fever
Scleral icterus
Pleural effusion
See Presentation for more detail.
Laboratory studies that may be considered include the following:
Serum amylase and lipase levels (limited utility) – Often elevated but may be within the reference ranges
Serum bilirubin and liver function tests (limited utility) – Sometimes elevated if the biliary tree is involved
Cyst fluid analysis – Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CEA-125 (low in pseudocysts and elevated in tumors); fluid viscosity (low in pseudocysts and elevated in tumors); amylase (usually high in pseudocysts and low in tumors)
Imaging studies that may be helpful include the following:
Abdominal ultrasonography – Not the study of choice for establishing a diagnosis
Abdominal computed tomography (CT) – The criterion standard for pancreatic pseudocysts
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) – Not necessary for diagnosis but useful in planning drainage strategy.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) – Not necessary for diagnosis but useful in detecting a solid component to the cyst and in differentiating between organized necrosis and a pseudocyst
Endoscopic ultrasonography – Not necessary for diagnosis but very important in planning therapy, particularly if endoscopic drainage is contemplated
See Workup for more detail.
Most pseudocysts resolve without interference and only require supportive care. For some, drainage is indicated. Indications for drainage include the following:
Complications
Symptoms
Concern about possible malignancy
Drainage options are as follows:
Percutaneous catheter drainage – The procedure of choice for infected pseudocysts; although recurrence and failure rates are high, it may be a good temporizing measure
Endoscopic drainage, either transpapillary (via ERCP) or transmural – The complication rate appears to decrease and efficacy to increase with experience
Surgical drainage – The criterion standard; internal drainage is the procedure of choice, but laparoscopic drainage has yielded good results in some cases
No medications are specific to the treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. Antibiotics and octreotide may be useful adjuncts in some cases.
See Treatment and Medication for more detail.
Pseudocysts are best defined as localized fluid collections that are rich in amylase and other pancreatic enzymes, that have a nonepithelialized wall consisting of fibrous and granulation tissue, and usually appears several weeks after the onset of pancreatitis. [1]
These characteristics contrast with those of acute fluid collections, which are more evanescent and are serosanguinous inflammatory reactions to acute pancreatitis. These collections are noted in moderate-to-severe pancreatitis. Acute fluid collections usually have an irregular shape and lack a well-defined wall. In general, they resolve in about 65% of cases.
Two other types of fluid collection should be considered. First, an organized necrosis is actually devitalized pancreatic tissue that appears cystlike on computed tomography (CT) scans, but it appears to be solid on other imaging modalities. Second, an abscess is an infected area of necrosis or fluid.
Acute or, rarely, chronic pancreatitis or abdominal trauma causes pseudocysts. If no history of pancreatitis or trauma exists, the diagnosis must be carefully confirmed.
Single or multiple fluid collections that look like cysts on pancreatic imaging are often observed during acute pancreatitis. Because of increasing sensitivity of imaging modalities and improvements in technology providing enhanced therapeutic abilities, the question arises as to when and whether drainage should be performed and what modality should be used to drain the cysts. [2] Strictly defining the type of fluid collection is very important when reviewing pancreatic fluid collections. The therapeutic approach is different depending on the type of collection.
Pancreatic pseudocysts can be single or multiple. Multiple cysts are more frequently observed in patients with alcoholism, and they can be multiple in about 15% of cases. Size varies from 2-30 cm. About one third of pseudocysts manifest in the head of the gland, and two thirds appear in the tail. The fluid in pseudocysts has been well characterized as clear or watery, or it can be xanthochromic. The fluid in pseudocysts usually contains very high amounts of amylase, lipase, and trypsin, though the amylase level may decrease over time.
The pathogenesis of pseudocysts seems to stem from disruptions of the pancreatic duct due to pancreatitis and extravasation of the enzymatic material. Two thirds of patients with pseudocysts have demonstrable connections to the pancreatic duct. In the other third, an inflammatory reaction is supposed to have sealed the connection so that it is not demonstrable. The cause of pseudocysts parallels the cause of acute pancreatitis; 75-85% of cases are caused by alcohol or gallstone disease–related pancreatitis. In children, pseudocysts and trauma are frequently associated.
The male predominance in the incidence of pseudocysts mirrors the male predominance in the incidence of pancreatitis.
Pseudocysts may occur after pancreatitis in any age group. In children, pseudocysts are most likely observed after abdominal trauma. In elderly persons, care should be taken not to confuse cystic neoplasms with pseudocysts.
Most pseudocysts resolve without interference, and patients do well without intervention. The outcome is much worse for patients who develop complications or who have the cyst drained. The presence of pancreatic necrosis is a poor prognostic sign.
The failure rate for drainage procedures is about 10%, the recurrence rate is about 15%, and the complication rate is 15-20%.
Bleeding is the most feared complication and is caused by the erosion of the pseudocyst into a vessel. Consider the possibility of bleeding in any patient who has a sudden increase in abdominal pain coupled with a drop in hematocrit level or a change in vital signs. Therapy is emergent surgery or angiography with embolization of the bleeding vessel.
Do not perform a percutaneous or endoscopic drainage procedure under any circumstances in patients with suspected bleeding into a pseudocyst. Consider the possibility of infection of the pseudocyst in patients who develop fever or an elevated WBC count. Treat infection with antibiotics and urgent drainage.
GI obstruction, manifesting as nausea and vomiting, is an indication for drainage.
The pseudocyst can also rupture. A controlled rupture into an enteric organ occasionally causes GI bleeding. On rare occasions, a profound rupture into the peritoneal cavity causes peritonitis and death.
Patients who are being managed expectantly must be educated about the warning signs for potential complications (eg, abdominal pain, fever), which may indicate bleeding, infection, or pseudocyst rupture.
For patient education resources, see the Digestive Disorders Center, as well as Pancreatitis and Abdominal Pain in Adults.
Brun A, Agarwal N, Pitchumoni CS. Fluid collections in and around the pancreas in acute pancreatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Aug. 45(7):614-25. [Medline].
Jani N, Bani Hani M, Schulick RD, Hruban RH, Cunningham SC. Diagnosis and management of cystic lesions of the pancreas. Diagn Ther Endosc. 2011. 2011:478913. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Vege SS, Ziring B, Jain R, Moayyedi P. American Gastroenterological Association Institute guideline on the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic neoplastic pancreatic cysts. Gastroenterology. 2015 Apr. 148(4):819-22. [Medline].
Bhasin DK, Rana SS, Sharma V, et al. Non-surgical management of pancreatic pseudocysts associated with arterial pseudoaneurysm. Pancreatology. 2013 May-Jun. 13(3):250-3. [Medline].
Zheng M, Qin M. Endoscopic ultrasound guided transgastric stenting for the treatment of traumatic pancreatic pseudocyst. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011 Jul-Aug. 58(109):1106-9. [Medline].
Weckman L, Kylanpaa ML, Puolakkainen P, Halttunen J. Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Endosc. 2006 Apr. 20(4):603-7. [Medline].
FDA news release. FDA allows marketing of new stent for treating pseudocysts of the pancreas. December 18, 2013. Available at http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm379195.htm. Accessed: January 7, 2014.
Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Sutton BS, Trevino JM, Christein JD, Wilcox CM. Equal efficacy of endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 2013 Sep. 145(3):583-90.e1. [Medline].
Aljarabah M, Ammori BJ. Laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches for drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a systematic review of published series. Surg Endosc. 2007 Nov. 21(11):1936-44. [Medline].
Oida T, Mimatsu K, Kano H, et al. Laparoscopic cystogastrostomy via the posterior approach for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011 Sep-Oct. 58(110-111):1771-5. [Medline].
Beckingham IJ, Krige JE, Bornman PC, Terblanche J. Long term outcome of endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Jan. 94(1):71-4. [Medline].
Binmoeller KF, Seifert H, Walter A, Soehendra N. Transpapillary and transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995 Sep. 42(3):219-24. [Medline].
Criado E, De Stefano AA, Weiner TM, Jaques PF. Long term results of percutaneous catheter drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992 Oct. 175(4):293-8. [Medline].
D’Agostino HB, vanSonnenberg E, Sanchez RB, Goodacre BW, Villaveiran RG, Lyche K. Treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts with percutaneous drainage and octreotide. Work in progress. Radiology. 1993 Jun. 187(3):685-8. [Medline].
El Hamel A, Parc R, Adda G, Bouteloup PY, Huguet C, Malafosse M. Bleeding pseudocysts and pseudoaneurysms in chronic pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 1991 Sep. 78(9):1059-63. [Medline].
Gershoni-Baruch R, Mandel H, Bar El H, Bar-Nizan N, Borochowitz Z, Dar H. Interstitial deletion (6)q13q15. Am J Med Genet. 1996 Apr 24. 62(4):345-7. [Medline].
Heider R, Meyer AA, Galanko JA, Behrns KE. Percutaneous drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts is associated with a higher failure rate than surgical treatment in unselected patients. Ann Surg. 1999 Jun. 229(6):781-7; discussion 787-9. [Medline].
Howell DA, Elton E, Parsons WG. Endoscopic management of pseudocysts of the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1998 Jan. 8(1):143-62. [Medline].
Lewandrowski KB, Southern JF, Pins MR, Compton CC, Warshaw AL. Cyst fluid analysis in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cysts. A comparison of pseudocysts, serous cystadenomas, mucinous cystic neoplasms, and mucinous cystadenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 1993 Jan. 217(1):41-7. [Medline].
Morton JM, Brown A, Galanko JA, Norton JA, Grimm IS, Behrns KE. A national comparison of surgical versus percutaneous drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: 1997-2001. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005 Jan. 9(1):15-20; discussion 20-1. [Medline].
Nealon WH, Walser E. Surgical management of complications associated with percutaneous and/or endoscopic management of pseudocyst of the pancreas. Ann Surg. 2005 Jun. 241(6):948-57; discussion 957-60. [Medline].
Nguyen BL, Thompson JS, Edney JA, Bragg LE, Rikkers LF. Influence of the etiology of pancreatitis on the natural history of pancreatic pseudocysts. Am J Surg. 1991 Dec. 162(6):527-30; discussion 531. [Medline].
Pitchumoni CS, Agarwal N. Pancreatic pseudocysts. When and how should drainage be performed?. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1999 Sep. 28(3):615-39. [Medline].
Sahani DV, Kadavigere R, Saokar A, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Brugge WR, Hahn PF. Cystic pancreatic lesions: a simple imaging-based classification system for guiding management. Radiographics. 2005 Nov-Dec. 25(6):1471-84. [Medline].
Soliani P, Franzini C, Ziegler S, et al. Pancreatic pseudocysts following acute pancreatitis: risk factors influencing therapeutic outcomes. JOP. 2004 Sep 10. 5(5):338-47. [Medline].
Vitas GJ, Sarr MG. Selected management of pancreatic pseudocysts: operative versus expectant management. Surgery. 1992 Feb. 111(2):123-30. [Medline].
Warshaw AL, Compton CC, Lewandrowski K, Cardenosa G, Mueller PR. Cystic tumors of the pancreas. New clinical, radiologic, and pathologic observations in 67 patients. Ann Surg. 1990 Oct. 212(4):432-43; discussion 444-5. [Medline].
Warshaw AL, Rutledge PL. Cystic tumors mistaken for pancreatic pseudocysts. Ann Surg. 1987 Apr. 205(4):393-8. [Medline].
Yeo CJ, Bastidas JA, Lynch-Nyhan A, Fishman EK, Zinner MJ, Cameron JL. The natural history of pancreatic pseudocysts documented by computed tomography. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990 May. 170(5):411-7. [Medline].
Ates U, Kucuk G, Cınar K, et al. Endoscopic drainage and cystoduodedonstomy in a child with pancreatic pseudocyst. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2017 Nov. 23(6):521-4. [Medline].
Louis R Lambiase, MD, MHA Professor of Medicine, University of Tennessee College of Medicine Chattanooga; Chief, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Tennessee Chattanooga Unit; Assistant Dean for Clinical Affairs, University of Tennessee College of Medicine Chattanooga
Louis R Lambiase, MD, MHA is a member of the following medical societies: American Gastroenterological Association, American Pancreatic Association, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference
Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.
BS Anand, MD Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Baylor College of Medicine
BS Anand, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, American Gastroenterological Association, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
David Greenwald, MD Professor of Clinical Medicine, Fellowship Program Director, Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine
David Greenwald, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, New York Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, American College of Gastroenterology, American College of Physicians, American Gastroenterological Association, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Simmy Bank, MD Chair, Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Long Island Jewish Hospital, Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Pancreatic Pseudocysts
Research & References of Pancreatic Pseudocysts|A&C Accounting And Tax Services
Source
0 Comments