Scaphoid Fracture Imaging
No Results
No Results
processing….
The scaphoid is the most frequently fractured carpal bone, accounting for 71% of all carpal bone fractures. Scaphoid fractures often occur in young and middle-aged adults, typically those aged 15-60 years, after a fall on an outstretched arm that results in acute dorsal flexion of the wrist. About 5-12% of scaphoid fractures are associated with other fractures, and approximately 1% of scaphoid fractures are bilateral. Scaphoid fracture diagnosis is important because 90% of all acute scaphoid fractures heal if treated early.
Radiographic evaluation of a scaphoid fracture begins with conventional radiography. [1] Early diagnosis of a scaphoid fracture is important because nonunion is more likely if treatment is delayed. The initial assessment of stability influences management; a careful evaluation is required. [2, 3, 4]
CT scanning is excellent in the initial evaluation of a scaphoid fracture, particularly in a high-performance athlete in whom initial radiographic findings are normal. Also, CT scanning can demonstrate healing, which is sometimes misleading on radiographs, particularly with hardware in place.
Instead of CT scanning, MRI can be used as a screening tool for patients with negative radiographic results. Also, magnetic MRIs may define bone contusions rather than fracture as the source of pain. It has been used in the evaluation of complications, particularly osteonecrosis, but care should be emphasized in the diagnosis of avascularity, because some ischemia is expected in the proximal pole after waist and proximal-pole fractures. Typically, MRI is not useful in the evaluation of healing. [5, 6, 7, 8]
Ultrasonography can detect dislocated fractures of the scaphoid waist based on cortical disruption and/or parossal hematoma. However, this modality is limited by the difficulties in scanning the proximal and distal thirds of the scaphoid. Non-dislocated fractures are also difficult to detect. Ultrasonography can be used for position monitoring of previously identified childhood fractures, but it requires high operator expertise. [1]
(See the images below.)
Stress fractures of the scaphoid are rare and have been attributed to repeated or excessive dorsal flexion of the wrist. Carpal scaphoid stress fractures have been reported in athletes engaging in gymnastics, shot put, diving, badminton, tennis, soccer, and cricket. [9]
According to Evenski et al, scaphoid fractures are often missed in children because of their rarity and because of the difficulty in making a radiographic diagnosis. Of 104 cases with high clinical suspicion but no radiographic evidence of scaphoid fracture, 31 (30%) were found to have scaphoid fractures at radiographic follow-up. Volar tenderness over the scaphoid, pain with radial deviation, and pain with active wrist range of motion were identified as significant predictors. As a result of their findings, the investigators recommended that clinically suspected pediatric scaphoid fractures be immobilized, with repeat radiographs and a clinical examination at 2 weeks. [10]
Pierre-Jerome et al studied 125 cases of acute trauma with negative radiographs, but with clinical examination findings suggesting wrist or distal forearm fracture, and they found occult bone injuries in 78 (62.4%) of the 125 wrists. The occult bone injuries included 53 (68%) of the 78 wrists having more than one injured bone and 25 (32%) having one injured bone. The distal radius was the most frequent location for an occult fracture line. The injuries without a fracture line (contusion) were present in 49 (63%) of 78 wrists and were found most frequently in the scaphoid (35 cases). [11]
Ramos-Escalona et al in a retrospective review of radiographs of 66 scaphoid fractures, to evaluate ulnar variance, found that 21 patients (31.8%) had an ulna-neutral wrist; 6 patients (9.1%) had an ulna-plus wrist; and 39 patients (59.1%) had an ulna-minus wrist. The mean ulnar variance was -1.3 mm (range -5.5, 2.5). [12]
Scaphoid fractures have been classified according to various criteria. For example, they can be grouped according to the anatomic location, as follows (see the image below):
Tubercle fractures – These are usually uncomplicated, and if nonunion occurs, they are frequently asymptomatic.
Distal-pole fractures – Such fractures are usually uneventful. This group can be subdivided into the following: fractures that involve the articulation with the trapezium and trapezoid; and fractures that do not involve this articulation
Proximal-pole fractures – The more proximally located the fracture plane is, the greater the risk of delayed union, nonunion, and avascular necrosis (AVN). [13]
Scaphoid fractures can also be classified according to the plane of fracture with respect to the long axis of the scaphoid, being grouped into horizontal oblique, transverse, and vertical oblique fractures. Increased shear forces in vertical oblique fractures may prolong the time for fracture healing (see the image below).
Another classification system categorizes scaphoid fractures according to the time of injury and subsequent healing, as follows:
Acute
Delayed union – An incomplete union after 4 months of cast immobilization.
Nonunion – An unhealed fracture with smooth, polished surfaces of fibrocartilage.
This classification system is used in treatment planning, because a delayed union may be successfully treated with prolonged casting, whereas a nonunion requires internal fixation. About 90% of all acute scaphoid fractures heal if treated early.
The most important classification scheme distinguishes stable scaphoid fractures from unstable ones (see the image below).
Stable fractures are incomplete or, if they appear complete, are likely to have an incompletely disrupted articular surface (that is, intact overlying cartilage). Neither displacement nor motion about the fracture occurs with wrist motion. Stable fractures are not associated with ligamentous injury. They are treated with immobilization alone, although stable fractures usually heal regardless of the type of treatment and can even do so without treatment.
Unstable fractures are complete fractures with motion about the fracture site. Findings that indicate instability include cortical offset greater than 1 mm, fracture angulation, associated ligamentous injury, and motion with ulnar or radial deviation. Ligamentous injury most frequently involves the scapholunate ligament; the scapholunate interval may widen, or a DISI pattern may be seen on a lateral view. Unstable fractures require fixation; it is impossible to maintain reduction of an unstable fracture with cast immobilization alone.
When displacement occurs about the scaphoid fracture, ligamentous injury and instability should be suspected. Posttraumatic instability typically involves the proximal carpal row, which acts as a link between the distal radius and distal carpal row. This instability may be static or dynamic. With static instability, the patient is unable to position the carpal bones normally, and the abnormal alignment is readily visible on routine radiographs. With dynamic instability, the carpal alignment appears normal on radiographs, but it becomes abnormal in certain positions or with motions of the wrist.
The most common carpal instability pattern is scapholunate dissociation. It is frequently the first radiographic sign to suggest instability. However, although the scapholunate ligament may be disrupted, the scapholunate interval may be normal. A scapholunate distance of 2-3 mm or more on a routine posteroanterior (PA) view suggests elongation and possible disruption of the scapholunate ligament. A distance greater than 4 mm is considered to be diagnostic of a scapholunate ligament disruption, although this distance should be viewed in the context of the other intercarpal distances.
Recognition of carpal instability is important and helpful in treatment planning, because such instability reflects a more serious injury. Instability patterns may not be recognized on the initial radiographs and should be evaluated with every follow-up study. Intercarpal collapse may predispose the patient to nonunion and degenerative arthritis.
The initial radiographic assessment of scaphoid fractures is performed with plain radiography. Standard views vary among institutions, but most use a minimum of 3 views: PA, true lateral, and semipronated oblique with, in many instances, ulnar deviation.
The patient with a scaphoid fracture often holds the wrist in radial deviation, thereby shortening the scaphoid and limiting its evaluation. To elongate the scaphoid, a scaphoid view is often obtained by positioning the wrist in ulnar deviation and angling the tube cranially by 20-40°. A myriad of additional views have been described for better evaluation of different areas of the scaphoid. [14, 15, 16, 17, 18]
A fracture is typically identified as a lucent line with at least 1 disrupted cortex. Occasionally, an opaque line is seen as a result of overriding fragments, a stress fracture, or fracture healing. Angulation of the scaphoid or separate fracture fragments may be observed. Fractures may be difficult to see; only 25% are visible on all views. The PA view allows visualization of 75% of visible fractures; the semipronated view, 77%; the lateral view, 22%; and the semisupinated view, 22%. About 2-5% of scaphoid fractures, particularly incomplete fractures along the capitate-side surface, cannot be seen on the initial image.
Evaluation of the soft tissues may aid in the radiologist’s evaluation. The scaphoid, or navicular, fat stripe consists of fat that is interposed between the radial collateral ligament and the tendons of the abductor pollicis longus and the extensor pollicis brevis. It is visible in 90% of healthy individuals when the soft tissues are visualized. It may be obscured if the wrist is held in radial deviation.
Obliteration or displacement of the fat stripe usually occurs within 1 hour after the scaphoid fracture occurs. Frequently, dorsal soft-tissue swelling is present. These findings are nonspecific and can be seen with other fractures and soft-tissue injuries about the wrist. Because a normal fat stripe with a scaphoid fracture is exceedingly uncommon, a scaphoid fracture is virtually excluded when the scaphoid fat stripe is normal (see the images below).
The type and location of the scaphoid fracture may influence how conspicuous it is. Small avulsions and incomplete horizontal-oblique or distal-pole fractures are more difficult to detect than are complete transverse-oblique fractures. Fractures of the distal pole and tubercle may require special views. Technical factors also influence the detectability of scaphoid fractures. Underexposure or overexposure and patient motion limit bone detail. The film-screen combination used can greatly affect bone detail and, therefore, the visibility of subtle fractures. These factors are typically not addressed when comparative image studies are performed.
The stability of the fracture should be addressed at the initial examination, as well as at all follow-up examinations. A stable fracture is nondisplaced and does not have evidence of ligamentous instability. An unstable fracture is displaced by more than 1 mm, is angulated, or has a pattern of associated ligamentous instability. The 2 most common patterns of ligamentous instability are scapholunate dissociation and dorsal intercalated segment instability (DISI).
Although scaphoid fracture displacement and angulation can be assessed on conventional radiographs, difficulty may arise because of superimposed bone or an inability to position the patient properly. Often, displacement in the coronal plane is readily seen on conventional radiographs; however, CT scanning allows the evaluation of displacement in all planes of orientation. Three-dimensional, reformatted images also may demonstrate rotational patterns of displacement.
Angulation of the scaphoid at the fracture is often called the humpback deformity. This angulation is associated with a greater likelihood of nonunion, worse clinical outcome, and arthritis. Determination of the intrascaphoid angle can be difficult to make on conventional radiographs and is usually more easily made on a tomographic image. [19]
Amadio and colleagues used trispiral tomography scanning to determine the normal and abnormal intrascaphoid angle. [20] In their study, the tomographic scan that best displayed the scaphoid was chosen. The articular surfaces were identified, and a line was drawn to connect the extremes of the proximal and distal convex articular surfaces. A perpendicular to each line was drawn, and the resultant angle was noted. The intrascaphoid angle was evaluated in the coronal and sagittal planes.
Ten normal wrists were studied to determine the normal range. A total of 46 scaphoids with fractures also were evaluated, and the patients were followed up for a mean period of 63 months. The normal sagittal, intrascaphoid angle was 15-34° (mean, 24° ± 5). An angle of 45° was chosen as abnormal to include most patients with poor clinical outcomes and a minimum of those with good clinical results. The coronal intrascaphoid angle was 32-46° (mean, 40° ± 4). However, the lateral intrascaphoid angle was a better clinical discriminator (see the image below)
Amadio and coauthors [20] also developed a second method to assess the intrascaphoid angle. This method, the cortical technique, may be somewhat more reproducible because it is less dependent on the observer to define the convex articular surface. On a sagittal image, a line is drawn over the flattened volar cortex between the proximal convexity and the curve distal to the waist of the scaphoid. A second line is drawn over the dorsal flattening between the waist and the distal convexity. The lateral intrascaphoid angle with this technique is 31.9° ± 8.5. The authors suggested that an abnormal intrascaphoid angle is greater than 42°. This study did not address clinical outcome.
Although polytomography scanning was used in both of these studies, the results should be valid for conventional radiography, CT scanning, and MRI, if the landmarks are visualized.
If clinical concern persists despite normal radiographic results, the clinician has 2 main options. First, the patient’s hand and wrist can be immobilized, and radiographs can be repeated after 2 weeks to detect an initially occult fracture. Second, additional imaging modalities may be used as alternatives. Radionuclide bone scintigraphy, polytomography scanning, CT scanning, and MRI have been advocated.
A linear lucency may be suggested by a prominent trabecular pattern across the waist of the scaphoid (see the image below). This pseudofracture may be particularly suspicious when it is adjacent to a small tubercle on the radial margin of the scaphoid, a normal structure that may be more prominent in some individuals. The distinguishing feature is an intact cortical margin; careful examination reveals trabeculae that traverse the lucency.
Abdel-Salam and colleagues recommend the acquisition of a comparable view of the contralateral wrist if the pseudofracture line persists at the 2-week follow-up examination. [21] If the appearance is the same in both wrists, a fracture is excluded. If the appearance is different, a fracture is likely. Additional imaging with CT scanning or MRI may be used at this point. Rarely, an accessory ossicle, the os carpi centrale, can create a Mach line that overlies the waist of the scaphoid and gives the appearance of a fracture.
About 2-5% of scaphoid fractures, particularly incomplete fractures that are located along the capitate-side surface, cannot be seen on the initial image.
A section thickness of 1-2 mm is typical, whether sequence or spiral acquisition is used. One-millimeter scanning allows the production of excellent reformatted images. The oblique sagittal plane through the long axis of the scaphoid may be the preferred plane of orientation. [22, 23, 24, 25, 26]
When the mechanism of injury is being considered, optimal display of the volar and dorsal cortices is preferred {see the images below). Presumably, incomplete fractures may be missed on oblique coronal images. Axial imaging with reformatted images can be obtained, provided that the reformatted images are in the planes of the scaphoid and not in the anatomic planes. Edge detail is lost, and some blurring is inherent to spiral techniques, although many clinicians find them to be adequate.
Several studies have demonstrated the superior ability of cone-beam CT (CBCT) compared to radiographs for the diagnosis of scaphoid fractures. [27, 28, 29] Additional advantages of CBCT are that it uses low-dose radiation and it allows the radiation-sensitive organs to be shielded because of scanner design, which can further reduce the effective dose of the examination. [29]
CT scanning permits an accurate anatomic assessment of the fracture. Bone contusions are not evaluated with CT scanning, but true fractures can be excluded. CT scanning also allows volumetric analysis for determining the graft size that is needed to correct an angular deformity.
Pseudofractures are a plain radiographic phenomenon and not depicted on CT scans. Occasionally, an entering vessel may cause the cortex to be incomplete. This is usually distinguished on adjacent images. As the vessel enters the bone, the walls have a thin, dense rim not found about a fracture line.
MRI has been suggested as an easy, quick, and perhaps cost-effective method to evaluate acute scaphoid fractures. T1-weighted images obtained in a single plane (coronal) are typically sufficient to determine the presence of a scaphoid fracture. This limited evaluation can be cost-effective, and unlike CT scanning, it does not require special positioning of the patient’s hand, which may be an important consideration in the patient with a painful wrist. [5, 6, 7, 8, 30, 31, 32]
The classic pattern of a fracture on an MRI scan is a linear focus of decreased signal intensity on T1-weighted images. Increased signal intensity in a distribution similar to that of the T1-weighted images is seen with T2-weighted sequences. The fracture line may be more difficult to see on T2-weighted images.
Short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) and fat-suppressed, T2-weighted sequences are very sensitive to edema. Although they are more sensitive to edema than are T1-weighted images, fractures may be overdiagnosed. A localized or diffuse region of decreased signal intensity without a discrete fracture line is consistent with the microtrauma associated with the impaction of the bone trabeculae, as found in bone bruises and contusions (see the image below).
Gadolinium-based contrast agents have been linked to the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) or nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy (NFD). The disease has occurred in patients with moderate to end-stage renal disease after being given a gadolinium-based contrast agent to enhance MRI or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) scans. NSF/NFD is a debilitating and sometimes fatal disease. Characteristics include red or dark patches on the skin; burning, itching, swelling, hardening, and tightening of the skin; yellow spots on the whites of the eyes; joint stiffness with trouble moving or straightening the arms, hands, legs, or feet; pain deep in the hip bones or ribs; and muscle weakness.
MRI results can lead to the overdiagnosis of scaphoid fractures. Lepisto and colleagues evaluated the use of MRI within 4 weeks of injury in 18 consecutive patients. [33] Of the 11 diagnosed fractures, the fracture line was clearly seen in only 2. The authors did not consider bone contusions as a separate entity and believed that hemorrhage and edema obliterated the actual fracture line. They offered no follow-up report for the patients examined.
In a separate study by Imaeda and colleagues, an oblique image that was obtained through the long axis of the scaphoid allowed visualization of 11 of 11 fracture lines. [34] In 10 of 11 fractures, the fracture line was visible in the coronal plane. High signal intensity, seen in the distal fragment on T2-weighted images, was characteristic of recent fractures. T1-weighted coronal images allow identification of the fracture, which is often seen on an initial coronal scout image. This suggests that limited MRI scans in only 1 imaging plane may cause some fractures to be missed.
When edema is present, contusions may be falsely identified as fractures.
Radionuclide bone scanning is typically performed 3-7 days after the initial injury if the radiographic findings are normal. Bone scan findings are considered positive for a fracture when intense, focal tracer accumulation is identified. [35] Negative bone scan results virtually exclude scaphoid fracture. Injury to other carpal bones may also be discovered with radionuclide bone scanning.
According to some studies, 25-60% of scaphoid fractures that are suspected on the basis of bone scan results are never confirmed at radiography. Most of these suspected fractures are probably bone contusions or incomplete cortical fractures. Treatment can be based on the results of bone scintigraphy, although this practice results in substantial overtreatment of patients, because most small, incomplete cortical fractures and bone contusions are likely to heal, even without treatment.
Scaphoid activity on a bone scan is not specific for a fracture, because bone contusions, degenerative disease, intraosseous ganglion, or another physiologically active process may have increased activity within the scaphoid.
As with any fracture, scintigraphic results are positive in all phases of a 3-phase bone scan. This finding helps in distinguishing chronic processes from an acute fracture.
Schmitt R, Rosenthal H. Imaging of Scaphoid Fractures According to the New S3 Guidelines. Rofo. 2016 May. 188 (5):459-69. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Mayfield JK, Gilula LA, Totty WG. Isolated carpal fractures. Bralow L, ed. The Traumatized Hand and Wrist: Radiographic and Anatomic Correlation. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1992. 249-63.
Metz VM, Gilula LA. Imaging techniques for distal radius fractures and related injuries. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993 Apr. 24(2):217-28. [Medline].
Rogers LF. The wrist. Radiology of Skeletal Trauma. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1992. 837-938.
Bervian MR, Ribak S, Livani B. Scaphoid fracture nonunion: correlation of radiographic imaging, proximal fragment histologic viability evaluation, and estimation of viability at surgery: diagnosis of scaphoid pseudarthrosis. Int Orthop. 2015 Jan. 39 (1):67-72. [Medline].
Larribe M, Gay A, Freire V, Bouvier C, Chagnaud C, Souteyrand P. Usefulness of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the evaluation of the viability of acute scaphoid fracture. Skeletal Radiol. 2014 Dec. 43 (12):1697-703. [Medline].
Bergh TH, Lindau T, Soldal LA, Bernardshaw SV, Behzadi M, Steen K, et al. Clinical scaphoid score (CSS) to identify scaphoid fracture with MRI in patients with normal x-ray after a wrist trauma. Emerg Med J. 2014 Aug. 31 (8):659-64. [Medline].
Ng AW, Griffith JF, Taljanovic MS, Li A, Tse WL, Ho PC. Is dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI useful for assessing proximal fragment vascularity in scaphoid fracture delayed and non-union?. Skeletal Radiol. 2013 Jul. 42 (7):983-92. [Medline].
Kohyama S, Kanamori A, Tanaka T, Hara Y, Yamazaki M. Stress fracture of the scaphoid in an elite junior tennis player: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep. 2016 Jan 18. 10:8. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Evenski AJ, Adamczyk MJ, Steiner RP, Morscher MA, Riley PM. Clinically suspected scaphoid fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Jun. 29(4):352-5. [Medline].
Pierre-Jerome C, Moncayo V, Albastaki U, Terk MR. Multiple occult wrist bone injuries and joint effusions: prevalence and distribution on MRI. Emerg Radiol. 2009 Aug 7. [Medline].
Ramos-Escalona J, García-Bordes L, Martínez-Galarza P, Yunta-Gallo A. Ulnar variance and scaphoid fracture. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2010 Mar. 35(3):195-7. [Medline].
Ramamurthy C, Cutler L, Nuttall D, et al. The factors affecting outcome after non-vascular bone grafting and internal fixation for nonunion of the scaphoid. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 May. 89(5):627-32. [Medline].
Dias JJ, Finlay DB, Brenkel IJ, et al. Radiographic assessment of soft tissue signs in clinically suspected scaphoid fractures: the incidence of false negative and false positive results. J Orthop Trauma. 1987. 1(3):205-8. [Medline].
Hendrix RW. Radiographic technique. Rogers LF. Radiology of Skeletal Trauma. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1992. 267-300.
Mann FA, Wilson AJ, Gilula LA. Radiographic evaluation of the wrist: what does the hand surgeon want to know?. Radiology. 1992 Jul. 184(1):15-24. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Rossi AR, DeSmet AA, Engber WD, et al. Plain film evaluation of bone grafting for nonunited scaphoid fractures. Skeletal Radiol. 1995 Jul. 24(5):361-4. [Medline].
Tiel-van Buul MM, van Beek EJ, Dijkstra PF, et al. Radiography of the carpal scaphoid. Experimental evaluation of “the carpal box” and first clinical results. Invest Radiol. 1992 Nov. 27(11):954-9. [Medline].
Smith DK, Linscheid RL, Amadio PC, et al. Scaphoid anatomy: evaluation with complex motion tomography. Radiology. 1989 Oct. 173(1):177-80. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Amadio PC, Berquist TH, Smith DK, et al. Scaphoid malunion. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1989 Jul. 14(4):679-87. [Medline].
Abdel-Salam A, Eyres KS, Cleary J. Detecting fractures of the scaphoid: the value of comparative X-rays of the uninjured wrist. J Hand Surg [Br]. 1992 Feb. 17(1):28-32. [Medline].
Smith ML, Bain GI, Chabrel N, Turner P, Carter C, Field J. Using computed tomography to assist with diagnosis of avascular necrosis complicating chronic scaphoid nonunion. J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Jul-Aug. 34(6):1037-43. [Medline].
Jonsson K, Jonsson A, Sloth M, et al. CT of the wrist in suspected scaphoid fracture. Acta Radiol. 1992 Sep. 33(5):500-1. [Medline].
Nakamura R, Imaeda T, Horii E, et al. Analysis of scaphoid fracture displacement by three-dimensional computed tomography. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1991 May. 16(3):485-92. [Medline].
Querellou S, Arnaud L, Williams T, Breton S, Colin D, Le Roux PY, et al. Role of SPECT/CT Compared With MRI in the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Wrist Trauma Occult Fractures. Clin Nucl Med. 2013 Mar 22. [Medline].
Allainmat L, Aubault M, Noël V, Baulieu F, Laulan J, Eder V. Use of Hybrid SPECT/CT for Diagnosis of Radiographic Occult Fractures of the Wrist. Clin Nucl Med. 2013 Jun. 38(6):e246-51. [Medline].
Edlund R, Skorpil M, Lapidus G, Bäcklund J. Cone-Beam CT in diagnosis of scaphoid fractures. Skeletal Radiol. 2016 Feb. 45 (2):197-204. [Medline].
Borel C, Larbi A, Delclaux S, Lapegue F, Chiavassa-Gandois H, Sans N, et al. Diagnostic value of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in occult scaphoid and wrist fractures. Eur J Radiol. 2017 Dec. 97:59-64. [Medline].
Neubauer J, Benndorf M, Ehritt-Braun C, Reising K, Yilmaz T, Klein C, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and radiography for scaphoid fractures. Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 2. 8 (1):3906. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Smith DK. Anatomic features of the carpal scaphoid: validation of biometric measurements and symmetry with three-dimensional MR imaging. Radiology. 1993 Apr. 187(1):187-91. [Medline]. [Full Text].
McNally EG, Goodman R, Burge P. The role of MRI in the assessment of scaphoid fracture healing: a pilot study. Eur Radiol. 2000. 10(12):1926-8. [Medline].
Hayter CL, Gold SL, Potter HG. Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist: Bone and cartilage injury. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 May. 37(5):1005-19. [Medline].
Lepisto J, Mattila K, Nieminen S, et al. Low field MRI and scaphoid fracture. J Hand Surg [Br]. 1995 Aug. 20(4):539-42. [Medline].
Imaeda T, Nakamura R, Miura T, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in scaphoid fractures. J Hand Surg [Br]. 1992 Feb. 17(1):20-7. [Medline].
Querellou S, Moineau G, Le Duc-Pennec A, Guillo P, Turzo A, Cotonea Y, et al. Detection of occult wrist fractures by quantitative radioscintigraphy: a prospective study on selected patients. Nucl Med Commun. 2009 Aug 7. [Medline].
Carol A Boles, MD Associate Professor, Associate in the Surgical Sciences – Orthopaedic, Department of Radiology, Section of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center
Carol A Boles, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, Association of University Radiologists, Radiological Society of North America, Society of Skeletal Radiology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
William R Reinus, MD, MBA, FACR Professor of Radiology, Temple University School of Medicine; Chief of Musculoskeletal and Trauma Radiology, Vice Chair, Department of Radiology, Temple University Hospital
William R Reinus, MD, MBA, FACR is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, Sigma Xi, American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Felix S Chew, MD, MBA, MEd Professor, Department of Radiology, Vice Chairman for Academic Innovation, Section Head of Musculoskeletal Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine
Felix S Chew, MD, MBA, MEd is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society, Association of University Radiologists, Radiological Society of North America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Scaphoid Fracture Imaging
Research & References of Scaphoid Fracture Imaging |A&C Accounting And Tax Services
Source
0 Comments